The onus is on me as a cyclist to be able to stop within the distance I can see to be clear, not on elderly pedestrians to get out of my way. To-be-seen lights are just a way of shifting the responsibility from me onto themYou are making the assumption the only issue with not having lights is cars not seeing them. It does not account for other road user (cyclists, pedestrains) particularly the elderly who cannot see as well.
You are fast moving, you are traffic, you need to-be-seen lights for yours and everyone else's safety.
What difference does it make whether the cyclist is lit or not? The cyclist should avoid the pedestrian by riding so they can stop within what they can see to be clear, lit or not - if they're not using a good headlight, that's probably going to be pretty slow outside of bright street lighting.Oh and what's not being smashed into by an unlit cyclit when crossing the road got to do with giving wsy to them?
What would you have done differently if they'd had lights?Oh and what's not being smashed into by an unlit cyclit when crossing the road got to do with giving wsy to them?
Not crossed in front of them as they couldn't be seen?What would you have done differently if they'd had lights?
You've answered your own question then: there is a direct link between whether they have lights and whether you give way to themNot crossed in front of them as they couldn't be seen?
But a oedestrian does not have a right to walk in front of traffic to make them stop. When on the road they have priority and everyone shoukd stop. But I can't just walk across the road in front of traffic.You've answered your own question then: there is a direct link between whether they have lights and whether you give way to them
Not to make them stop, but how can a cyclist tell why a pedestrian is walking out? Slow down. Don't like that? My response is tough, it's their space that you've been allowed on and should do so with their rules.But a oedestrian does not have a right to walk in front of traffic to make them stop.
But a oedestrian does not have a right to walk in front of traffic to make them stop. When on the road they have priority and everyone shoukd stop. But I can't just walk across the road in front of traffic.
Just need to be extra sure you're not walking in front of an idiot without lights you couldn't see.I do it a lot. You have to pick your battles and be prepared to move quickly if it doesn't work, but I practice it as an antidote to the prevailing power relationship. Holding your hand up like a traffic cop helps.
or gets hooked on a segregated section and gets the lights on the bike broken by the nobwit driver. ( wire came loose but couldn't see in the dark to fix it !) luckily on my red night vision evo jacket ( not hi viz but has retro reflective shapes on it ) I have a back up red LED light built inAll sounds to me like a lot of excuses to do something stupid and illegal.
I usually carry a pair of minimal tiny lithium battery (long shelf life) emergency lights in my bag with bottle tops taped over the on-off switches to avoid random switch-ons. Failing that, I've an app called "Mr White" on my phone which can be set to red or white as a last resort. It's a long walk home...luckily on my red night vision evo jacket ( not hi viz but has retro reflective shapes on it ) I have a back up red LED light built in