Drago
Legendary Member
- Location
- Suburban Poshshire
Where the situation permits, behind the first vehicle is perfect. Text book, in fact.
I'm sorry but that is too much of a sensible suggestion you should hang your head in shame, we as entitled cyclists should be allowed to go straight to the front & hold up the vehicles behind as much as we can, after all we pay as much road tax as they do!I really don't like ASLs and think they should be removed. I aim to find a place in the traffic towards the front rather than be in an ASL at the front with 5 or 6 frustrated drivers behind me itching to get past
Not only that, but we entitled cyclists must be permitted to break the law in retaliation to any law breaking we observe by other road users. And we can always pull out the safety card when we so....we as entitled cyclists should be allowed to go straight to the front & hold up the vehicles behind as much as we can, after all we pay as much road tax as they do!
How many times have you been asked by a driving non cyclist why should cyclists get to the front of the que only for all the cars to have to go to the huge hassle of overtaking again?
Does that mean up his ***?...(i suspect it's in its normal posterior position)
I refute that, if you a confident rider you can make your own space without being too aggressive,
But is it actually safer for them to go up the corridor of opening doors, then get to the end, do an immediate right across the front of queuing traffic all waiting at the green light grand prix & probably obvious to them, at a point when the lights could change at anytime. Then to have some impatient driver held up behind them out in no man's land.Well that's the problem isn't it? There are lots of would-be cyclists lacking confidence, that's why the narrative right now is to build infrastructure. You and me probably don't feel we need it, having been brought up in the school of hard knocks of UK cycling for the last x years🤷♂️