This will probably be my last post on the subject unless you can offer more than waffle. I haven't seen any evidence, overwhelming or otherwise, from you. What I have seen is 'it isn't in the highway code so it must be wrong/stupid/dangerous/confusing'. That isn't evidence. I have asked you for evidence of accidents resulting from this 'danger' and you refused. You said it would be a waste of time because you could just make up the example I've asked for. Well go for it then, if you can't think of a real example of right hand indicating resulting in an accident, make one up. Create a credible scenario where an accident would occur because of right hand indication on a RAB. If your scenario is believable I will happily admit my error. I think you would be pressing your luck with your suggestion that someone may pull onto a roundabout in front of another car because he thought that car was going to move into the right hand lane - that would be an accident caused by pure stupidity on the part of the driver being indicated at. Just to be absolutely clear, your example must be of an accident resulting from somone seeing the right hand indication and then doing something that results in an accident. Assume that the driver indicated at is not a stupid driver, as they would have accidents anyway.
When you've done that have a go at answering my simple questions (thrice ignored!) regarding the examples of accidents I have given. Help me to find out where I'm wrong on those too.
You are quite incredible - I actually think you believe what you write. Deluded.
How can you claim your position is credible, when you contradict every set of guidance and advice that exists?
You're basically saying that you can do whatever you want and unless there's a specific sentence saying you shouldn't do it in the highway code, then it's fine. As I said; find me the line that says you shouldn't close your eyes and hope for the best.
What part of this does your deluded little brain not understand? Your actions go against all advice for signalling.
Have you ever wondered why that is?
Your right hand signal is telling people that you're intending to turn right or pull out... yet you do neither. But apparently that doesn't matter.
It beggars belief that you can be so arrogant to invent a reason for signalling, not featured in any guidance, and insist it's the correct thing to do.
You've made up a few irrelevant questions to make yourself feel better. Well, oh deluded one, why don't you read the reply above from the motorcyclist that explains why it's confusing or dangerous?
Here's another, which funnily enough I saw yesterday and thought of you. There's a roundabout on the A10 where two lanes of cars go straight on, as is signposted. The car in the left lane began signalling right as he entered the roundabout, and the car slightly behind to his right used his brakes. In doing so, the car coming from the right, which would have passed without issue if no braking had occurred, suddenly had to react.
All caused by the prat signalling right from the left lane when he was intending on staying in the same lane.