cd365
Guru
- Location
- Coventry, uk
Early teensThat would be 90?
Early teensThat would be 90?
Yet it appears that the police seem to think it's OK in certain cases, and so do I.Personally I don't think anyone over a certain age should ever cycle on the pavement.
What about a parent cycling with their young child?Personally I don't think anyone over a certain age should ever cycle on the pavement.
Parent cycles on the road alongside the child, simplesWhat about a parent cycling with their young child?
I had that situation, there was only a path one one side of the road, what would you do going back the other direction?Parent cycles on the road alongside the child, simples
Cycle on the road behind the child, how i was with my childrenI had that situation, there was only a path one one side of the road, what would you do going back the other direction?
This was before I really returned to cycling, in a city, with two young children, and one of them had a very delayed road sense, the sort that meant they were accompanied when walking even in their early teens. With the youngest I did cycle but some roads in a city can be a bit too busy for primary age children.Cycle on the road behind the child, how i was with my children
There seems to be 2 major problems here - 1- allowing people to cycle on the pavement gives the green light to ALL the d--k heads to say "oh it's ok" and choose to ride along whenever, where ever and however they choose. Also it seems it is a little odd that parking on a pavement is a big no no and a hanging offence [no matter what the circumstances] whereas a full grown adult riding a bicycle is fine. Iam often a pedestrian and sorry but no I will not move over for a cyclist on the FOOTpath.
It seems the very few rules that apply to cyclists as usual are ok to flout as and when it suits but EVERYBODY else must obey the rules.
Keep it up boys and girls - now we know why another reason why people hate cyclists.
Also it seems it is a little odd that parking on a pavement is a big no no and a hanging offence [no matter what the circumstances] whereas a full grown adult riding a bicycle is fine.
Who argued that?
all i can see is misconceptions here.There seems to be 2 major problems here - 1- allowing people to cycle on the pavement gives the green light to ALL the d--k heads to say "oh it's ok" and choose to ride along whenever, where ever and however they choose. Also it seems it is a little odd that parking on a pavement is a big no no and a hanging offence [no matter what the circumstances] whereas a full grown adult riding a bicycle is fine. Iam often a pedestrian and sorry but no I will not move over for a cyclist on the FOOTpath.
It seems the very few rules that apply to cyclists as usual are ok to flout as and when it suits but EVERYBODY else must obey the rules.
Keep it up boys and girls - now we know why another reason why people hate cyclists.
Its not cycling on the footpath that irritates me, its people driving cars and vans on it, so they can use it as a car park. Nothing is ever done about cars and vans parked on the footpaths; how disabled folk in wheelchairs or mobility scooters manage I can't imagine. I recently complained to my local council about it but they couldn't care less.
Personally I don't think anyone over a certain age should ever cycle on the pavement.