simon.r
Person
- Location
- Nottingham
2413821 said:Well, since you have listed the alternatives which were presumably not impossible, it appears that your definition of necessity is the flexible one.
Alternative 1 - Move house. Not impossible. Move house 12+ times in 20 years - still not impossible, but disadvantages fairly obvious.
Alternative 2 - Long commute. Would mean being out of the house for 14+ hours, 5 days a week.Again, obvious disadvantages.
Alternative 3 - Less well paid job. Aside from the obvious drawbacks, issues such as self-esteem come into play.
So, yes, I agree with you again, my definition of necessity is flexible.
I am drawn towards a car-free lifestyle, I can see many advantages. But, in my opinion, without a massive change in the way virtually everything is organised (and I'm not talking about better public transport, more a whole-scale shift in attitudes and expectations of society in general and employers in particular), it is, at present, necessary for some people to own and use cars


just enough to see you got ganged up upon Brandane - something is happening to the @ sign in this forum, I've just noticed
... alas, it just told me I don't have permission to tag people!
... just 

.