Our brains are very well developed to calculate risk. That is one reason we have become the dominant species on the planet.
absolutely
Some have a greater aversion to risk than others but we can all assess risk extremely accurately.
Our brains are very well developed to calculate risk. That is one reason we have become the dominant species on the planet.
I cared to the extent that I asked after her health and whether she survived but I really had nothing on my conscience and wasn't going to let it bother me.
Link please.
If you slowed down for every group of people waiting at a pelican crossing for the green man you'd not only get nowhere fast (London's pavements are full of people) but you'd also likely cause accidents in the traffic behind you - motorists in London tend to expect to be able run at a constant speed green light after green light, slowing down at every crossing is just going to cause a concertina effect in the traffic and someone will overbrake and there'll be a rump crunch accident.
Maintaining a constant speed normally results in hitting all junction lights at green.
Amen. Red Light - If the lights have no legal significance for pedestrians why don't the government just make the lights face the traffic and save a fortune in unneeded pedestrian facing lights?
I would jump a red if to stop would put my life in danger
Our brains are very well developed to calculate risk. That is one reason we have become the dominant species on the planet.
If you slowed down for every group of people waiting at a pelican crossing for the green man you'd not only get nowhere fast (London's pavements are full of people) but you'd also likely cause accidents in the traffic behind you - motorists in London tend to expect to be able run at a constant speed green light after green light, slowing down at every crossing is just going to cause a concertina effect in the traffic and someone will overbrake and there'll be a rump crunch accident.
But it seems maintaining your speed to avoid delaying your important journey over-rides their safety.
So you support women cyclists jumping red lights then?
This again is demonstrably untrue, at least in zone 1. Motorists in London - or at least those motorists without great big dents in their vehicles - expect to frequently and regularly encounter cyclists, pedestrians, buses, traffic queues, U-turning taxis and all classes of imbecile in the road. If you don't have the skills to ride safely and anticipate hazards in a complex environment, don't expect much sympathy for the excuse that you "shouldn't have to"
Actually our brains are pretty crap at assessing risk. Which is why people think cycling is dangerous but walking or driving is not, why they will happily drive but are scared of flying, why they happily burn fossil fuels but are fearful of nuclear power, why they fear stranger danger but not friends and family, why they smoke and eat unhealthy diets etc etc
This again is demonstrably untrue, at least in zone 1. Motorists in London - or at least those motorists without great big dents in their vehicles - expect to frequently and regularly encounter cyclists, pedestrians, buses, traffic queues, U-turning taxis and all classes of imbecile in the road. If you don't have the skills to ride safely and anticipate hazards in a complex environment, don't expect much sympathy for the excuse that you "shouldn't have to"
2. All that slowing down does is delays your getting to the back of the next traffic queue.