U
User482
Guest
We've done this before, and people have already said why you're wrong. Are you going to keep on until you get the answer you'd like?I am not whining, just expressing my personal opinion. Take it or leave it.
We've done this before, and people have already said why you're wrong. Are you going to keep on until you get the answer you'd like?I am not whining, just expressing my personal opinion. Take it or leave it.
Which is at the heart of every decision we make.That's a financial thing...
That may or may not be the case, but we weren't talking about money.Which is at the heart of every decision we make.
There is a bit of incentives - I'll be having a charging point for the car installed - theres up to £500 grant for it. And the car would have been subsidised when it was bought in the first place. Cycle to work scheme too.We all polute when we drive, and yes the Goverment use it as a excuse to stealth tax us, but what they do not do is offer enough insentive to use alternative modes of transport.
It also depends on the vehicle.That's true only if you do a very low mileage.
I'm confused.The government and other official bodies want us to believe that diesel cars are bad for our health. Well, do they ever mention buses, lorries and most of all the big container ships that travel the world 24 hours a day? Their paranoïa is deep on cars but let's have a look at facts regarding the 15 biggest ships in the world . Those 15 ships pollute as much as 760 million cars! They use 10 000 tons of low quality fuel for a return journey from Asia to Europe. Their fuel produces 2000 times more sulphur than all the cars in America and Europe. And this is just scratching the surface about those giants.
So, after reading this, I don't feel any guilt about driving my diesel car 10 000 miles a year and doing 65 mpg.
Of course, those ships are part of the global economy and provide us with all those lovely goods we buy in the shops so it makes it alright to heavily pollute our skies.
Once again, the politicians and do-gooders are just a bunch of hypocrites.
In the next few years I can see both VED and fuel duty on diesel rising considerably, enough to at least wipe out any savings over petrol. I ran diesel for years when it was being heralded as the safe way to go, I wouldn't touch one now.
Sorry, OT. Not a marine engine.
This is a marine engine
I am not asking for an answer, like I said before, just expressing my own opinion. Whether you agree with me or not, it is entirely up to you, I won't lose sleep over it.We've done this before, and people have already said why you're wrong. Are you going to keep on until you get the answer you'd like?
But a diesels power band is the width of a chocolate mouses c ck. Nothing, nothing, everything all at once, nothing.But a petrol that can match the torque needs to be either very powerful or very big in cc' s the D engine just beats them hands down...go to Wales in a 84bhp loaded Ibiza..its ridiculous..get out and push almost
Not with a twin turbo.But a diesels power band is the width of a chocolate mouses c ck. Nothing, nothing, everything all at once, nothing.
But a diesels power band is the width of a chocolate mouses c ck. Nothing, nothing, everything all at once, nothing.