beancounter
Well-Known Member
- Location
- South Beds
beancounter said:To make money from benefits.
It's a lucrative "profession" these days, in our hand-out society.
bc
Origamist said:@Bollo. I am surprised you decided to stop and have words with them. I would not have done this.
Origamist said:@Bollo. I am surprised you decided to stop and have words with them. I would not have done this.
Origamist said:@Bollo. I am surprised you decided to stop and have words with them. I would not have done this.
Bollo said:You ask, so I will answer. If I'm insulted in the street and I feel I've done nothing to deserve it, I'm usually interested in why that might be. I believe that her attitude needed to be challenged, or she'll carry on being the unpleasant, bullying, arrogant little waste of air that I suspect she is. She was surprised that I answered back, and immediately went on the offensive, just like she's probably done with her teachers, the police and probation officers all her life.
I'm not naive enough to believe she'll have an epiphany based on our little chat, but she just might thing twice about behaving like a stupid cow next time.
Origamist said:I'm not going to engage with the psychological profiling you have supplied, but what I would say is that people should consider the possible consequences of confronting strangers over trifling incidents and a bit of verbal. Others, I know, disagree, and feel it necessary to "educate" fellow road users, but I would still advise caution.
Origamist said:I'm not going to engage with the psychological profiling you have supplied, but what I would say is that people should consider the possible consequences of confronting strangers over trifling incidents and a bit of verbal. Others, I know, disagree, and feel it necessary to "educate" fellow road users, but I would advise caution.
Bollo said:(Bites lip and attempts to give rational response....) OK, we thank you for your advice.
To put this into context, I'm one of the most liberal-minded, welfare-state supporting, mixed-marriage/faith partnered, Guardian-reading, benefit-of-the-doubt giving people you are likely to meet. But.....
This incident was one of those mean little instances of antisocial behaviour that just make life a little more crap. It serves no other purpose. Would I have challenged it if it've been 11pm at night and it was a group of 15 year olds? If I'm honest with myself, probably not, but I'd have felt ashamed for not doing so.
If you're referring to the recent cases where people have challenged antisocial behaviour and been seriously injuried or killed, then yes, that's terrible. Were they right to do what they did? Yes, I think they were and they paid a shocking price. By not standing up to this sort of behaviour, I think we're betraying these people and our own society.
Bollo said:(Bites lip and attempts to give rational response....) OK, we thank you for your advice.
To put this into context, I'm one of the most liberal-minded, welfare-state supporting, mixed-marriage/faith partnered, Guardian-reading, benefit-of-the-doubt giving people you are likely to meet. But.....
This incident was one of those mean little instances of antisocial behaviour that just make life a little more crap. It serves no other purpose. Would I have challenged it if it've been 11pm at night and it was a group of 15 year olds? If I'm honest with myself, probably not, but I'd have felt ashamed for not doing so.
If you're referring to the recent cases where people have challenged antisocial behaviour and been seriously injuried or killed, then yes, that's terrible. Were they right to do what they did? Yes, I think they were and they paid a shocking price. By not standing up to this sort of behaviour, I think we're betraying these people and our own society.
Cab said:You also have to consider the consequences of NOT engaging. Which means that while if you don't say anything you definitely won't change anything, but of you do then you just might. The risk in that scenario... Heck, I'd not have felt threatened.
Edit: Oh, and eloquently put Bollo. I still wouldn't have engaged these particular ladies, because just sometimes you can show more contempt with a facial expression and a contemptuous glare. Show 'em that they're dirt to you without saying anything, has more impact.
Origamist said:Cab, I have had friendly and unfriendly non-verbal interaction with plenty of road users in the past. Dialogue is not always required.
By engaging you might also make people dislike cyclists more.
Yeah, I'm sure your contemptuous glare would show them!