Dusty Bin
Guest
And I do know for a fact that I feel a lot safer in E123 races than I do in 34s. A whole lot.
The next E/1/2/3 event you take part in might be completely different

Last edited:
And I do know for a fact that I feel a lot safer in E123 races than I do in 34s. A whole lot.
I'm fine with the risks - I'm not the one complaining about them
I think you're misquoting me again. I never said don't bother. The skills are good to have. What I did say however (which is the bit you missed, I think) is that none of that will guarantee you a safe race.
As for the link - there's nothing new in there.
i agree with everythin u have said so far it pretty much makes scence. but as for sprinting for 39 position being stupid??? i think not. if someone is willing to give their all, even if it is for 39th then so what??? how in the hell does that constitute stupidity. im sorry but i think ur comment is out of order. i would sprint for 100th place if that ment i gained a place or 2 to improve on my last event. i think u need to cum down to earth a little, so u may be good at events an finish in a position worthy of sprinting for (what ever the hell that may be in ur rule book) what about people like us who are just trying their best at each even trying to improve by any small amount. that isnt stupidity is hard work an determination an does not deserve ridicule but prais
Also saying that an experienced rider is as much of a risk as a first timer is dumb.
Crashes happen due to unpreventable events, and crashes happen because of preventable events. Experience and knowledge/training greatly reduce the likelihood of preventable mistakes occurring. By logic, or even simple mathematics for those among us who suffer from lack of the former, this means that experience and knowledge both reduce the chance of crashing. To argue otherwise is completely counterintuitive to progress in the road race scene
Tell that to the fellas who crashed in my local E/1/2 crit last week (or it might have been the week before, can't remember). They weren't brought down by an inexperienced chopper.
Take that logic and apply it to something like F1 or Moto Gp - it doesn't work. All are experienced riders/drivers who have come up through the karting, FF, F3, or other national series - they still crash and they still bring each other down. Alternatively, just watch some cycle racing on TV - are the pros still crashing? They certainly are...
.
Take your F1 and Moto Gp example, except this time yourself, everybody in this thread and myself are also joining in the F1 and Moto races alongside the pros (assuming there is a lack of motor racing expertise with the average person). Guess what will happen...more crashes. The logic applies perfectly.
Dusty Bin.......... you are talking complete and utter trash, you seem to have no grasp of probability whatsoever! Additionally I suggest you look up the term straw-man if you don't already know what it means!
mate - it's not trash, it's a realistic opinion based on racing for over 20 years, as well as being a member of BC's regional competition and event safety commission, where this sort of stuff comes up all the time. Have you ever even ridden a road/circuit race?
No I haven't, I focus on Time Trials and Hill Climbs, however that is not relevant!
Probability applies here, and it says............ you are talking bunkum!
The risk of accidents is not reduced - because even those with the most knowledge and experience are still capable of causing crashes.