No need for mudguards and a rack with a Wingee

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

numbnuts

Legendary Member
Cool
 

TheJDog

dingo's kidneys
Look good, not sure where the attachment is at the front of the mudguard, and the size looks way too big for a racier frame, but the price, the price!
 

andrew_s

Legendary Member
Location
Gloucester
bit pricey, but looks quite good. 16kg load capacity* should be enough for most i guess.

* I guess that's what 'Maximale Traglast' means
It's 16 kg per side, which is plenty, even for most cycle campers.
The drawback if you start carrying a lot is that you don't have the rack top position, panniers only.

I think it expects bolt fittings at the fork crown, rear seatstay and chainstay bridges for the other attachment points.
There's nothing low down at the rear end of the rear 'guard, which may allow flutter and long term fatigue problems.
 
OP
OP
Pale Rider

Pale Rider

Legendary Member
https://www.canyon.com/en-gb/urban/commuter/commuter-5-0.html

Just noticed while looking through Canyon's sale for the tdf that they are using the wingee on some of their commuter bikes..

Good spot.

I see the same range of bikes has two types of belt drive, the Gates Carbon which I've heard of, but a couple have a Continental belt, which is new to me.

Slightly different design, featuring aramid (whatever that is) which Conti reckon is superior to carbon.

http://www.conti-drive-system.com/pages/riemenantrieb/riemenantrieb_en.html

https://www.canyon.com/en-gb/urban/commuter/commuter-6-0.html
 
Top Bottom