Illaveago
Guru
- Location
- Chippenham,Wiltshire.
Someone had better tell the Beeb . They still think he has been released .
He's won the chance to win the AUS Open. This is what he lives for. His career palmares will not record visa issues pre-tournament (or his status on the COV*D dick/hero spectrum).What sort of victory does he think he's won?
He has won a joint record 20 Grand Slam men's singles titles, including a record nine Australian Open titles.
I think they referring to the imminent re-cancellation and this time they will follow procedure.He's won the chance to win the AUS Open. This is what he lives for. His career palmares will not record visa issues pre-tournament (or his status on the COV*D dick/hero spectrum).
DJOKOVIC: Well as I said before ... I’m surprised that there is insufficient information on the very reason why I was granted the medical exemption by Victorian state independent medical panel which confirmed that I have fulfilled the criteria to enter Australia ... which is not on the paper which you read to me and that is if you had encountered or had a positive Covid PCR test in the previous six months, and you can provide the negative PCR test and the sufficient amount of antibodies, then you are granted access and that’s exactly what happened in the whole process.They are going along with procedural error, because he got both state and federal approval. The State did not follow Federal rules when they granted the exemption and the Federal approval was predicated on state following the rules. The Federal approval system is highly automated for speed.
I have a feeling that that they are going to ask for his blood sample for testing. And that's when he will leave.
The judge threw it out on procedural grounds. Act 2 is in progress. Interestingly the judge acknowledged that he can't do anything if he gets deported.From reading the court submission it seems there's a lot of stuff going on that we, the outraged public, did not know or just made assumptions about. There is some suggestion that the decision-makers regarding visas, entry conditions etc were going all Michael Masi and just making it up on the spot. It seems that there is provision within Australian immigration law for vaccination exemption following a PCR-confirmed COVID infection with a 6 month window. It seems that Novak had such an infection (whether or not he should be visiting a kitten orphanage after a positive test is nether here-nor-there for the sake of a visa status). It seems that this assertion was made during the visa revocation process. Now it seems that the court have backed Novak... for now.
I don't support his case nor agree with the moral stance, but it is the Australian authorities with egg on their faces and Novak with a heightened pantomime villainy. I assume there will ne no crowds at the Open?
Indeed - and the crux of Novak's defence was one of procedural error. It seems the authorities just can't proceed correctly.The judge threw it out on procedural grounds. Act 2 is in progress. Interestingly the judge acknowledged that he can't do anything if he gets deported.
I said used to be - history - it's all useful to students of human nature/relationships. Of course there is the goldfish alternative. Tribalism is pernicious, lots of examples of it - by the nature of things examples are in the past. Ditto most of books I read are about the past one way and another. One lives and learns.It's been three months. I know it's difficult but it's a new year so maybe now's the right time to let it go.
Who ? The judge ?The judge threw it out on procedural grounds. Act 2 is in progress. Interestingly the judge acknowledged that he can't do anything if he gets deported.
That is so, but then he’d be spreading it to others whilst asymptomatic, and as unvaccinated he would possibly then be a burden to the Australian health system, and also those he might infect.If he's tested clear, surely Australia is more of a risk to him, than he is to Australia, and it implies they don't have confidence in their measures to protect him.