[QUOTE 2342436, member: 9609"]It would be quite difficult to find where they work, and I can't imagine most employers being remotely interested about what their staff do out of work hours on their own bikes. Or do you mean report them to their spouses?[/quote]
No. Report them to their employer, as was said in the opening post.
How are you going to report them?
Force them to stop and then demand their name and address?
So apart from doing that are you going to go into the police station and say this guy on a blue bike pulled out on me.
Complete none starter.
Again as I said on in the opening post, its reporting them to their employer. In the same way that people advocate reporting & actually report drivers to their employers over their actions whilst in control/charge of their vehicle. I'll count myself in that last part.
If its got as far as even thinking about reporting them to their employers, then their employer must already be known. Sometimes through uniform, sometimes through actually seeing them entering their place of employment.
Still no-one has come forward to answer the question I asked as to why only those cycling on two wheels, are in their minds cyclists. P.O.B. was picked up on here, so I used it on here. Now there are those who are saying that
(only) a person on bike(two wheels) is a cyclist. They have made a further split within those who choose to cycle. As I choose at times to use three & four wheels, I'm not a cyclist.
Iet me ask this question about two of the people I mean. Both are paid to teach others,
primarily school kids how to cycle correctly on the roads. Yet what they are teaching by example may well be seen as acceptable, by those they are teaching.
One other is a councillour.