As soon as I get the 'SafeLights' forum up and running, you're barred for starters!BentMikey said:There are lots of upset people who've been hit by muppets on bikes. It's very anti-social behaviour, and it does cause injury, though not very often. But then that could be said for motor vehicles on the pavement too.
You can be a moderator.andyfromotley said:No properly researched evidence then?
Bollo said:Hey you guys! How about starting a new organisation called 'SafeLights'? Does anyone on here have a caravan, a ponytail and a GCSE in statistics (Grade 'C' or below)?
swee said:+1
I've honestly never seen a RLJ cause an incident in all my time cycling in London. Thats not to say I don't think its ever happened, but considering all the near misses of almost every other type of road user and behaviour that I have observed, I fail to see why RLJ is singled out in this way.
Notsoblue said:+1
I've honestly never seen a RLJ cause an incident in all my time cycling in London.
Bollo said:You can be a moderator.
hackbike 6 said:Despite which, speaking as one who has been commuting about 7 miles each way every working day of the year, regardless of wind, rain or snow, for five years, on some of London's busiest roads, where RLJ is absolutely endemic, I have yet to see a single incident, much less accident.
Does that make it any more right?
Hope motorists don't do it any more than they do,do it otherwise it will get hairy.I almost got rear ended by a young cyclist does that make it right?
He asked me why I stopped.
andyfromotley said:careful bollo, i'm not used to posts on here that are actually funny. please stop.
andyfromotley said:careful bollo, i'm not used to posts on here that are actually funny. please stop.