swee'pea99
Squire
They're great! I never have a problem with them, and they've cut the wait for my daily sangwidges down from four or five minutes to one, tops. And that's every day. Mustard!
taxing said:I put all my more expensive loose veg through as something cheaper. I think of it as my fee for becoming a temporary checkout operator.
wafflycat said:I refuse to use them. Not because of the technology but it strikes me that those tills represent fewer jobs in corporations that make vast profits and can afford to be employing people without denting profits severely.
vernon said:I'd call it obtaining goods by deception and resent your contribution to elevated prices to cover theft.
Reading this, I curse sometimes at a missed opportunity many years back. This was back in the 1980s, before such systems came into being. A colleague of mine, who had just given in his notice and was about to go freelance, earnestly tried to tempt me to team up with him. He'd dreamt up just such a system as this, and with my experience in embedded software, and he in hardware, he thought the two of us could make a killing. He showed me encouraging letters from the till manufacturers.vernon said:Before Safeways disappeared they introduced a self checking system that allowed shoppers to scan the goods as they placed them in the trolley and the checkouts took the money that was indicated on the scanners. To discourage dishonesty self service shoppers were randomly picked for a full scan at the checkouts.
I never got to try the system but it sounds superior to the current self service tills.
I wouldn't have stood for that. They can't surely prevent you from using a staffed till, as long as it's open without restrictions, can they? Perhaps you should have asked to see the supervisor's supervisor/manager...Phump said:This reminded me of a time when I was 'encouraged' to use the auto-checkout in B&Q. When I say 'encouraged' the supervisor woman actually shot in front of me as I approached a normal till (only one person waiting in the queue), insisted I use the auto one, mocked me when I said no thanks by saying (very loudly), "There's no need to be scared of it, it won't bite you, hahahaha!", then led me by the arm to the auto-checkout.
The railway ticket machines always do this, they give you change only in coins (although usually there are £1 coins) - even if it's £10 worth or more. I think it's something to do with the risk of notes jamming up the ticket and change dispenser...She said, no, I should feed in all the coins, then the £10 note, and it should give me either a £5 note or 5 £1 coins.
I dutifully did this (one handed, as was still having to hold crash helmet), and it gave me £5 change....in 20p's
taxing said:I'm saving them money by using the self-checkouts, because that's someone else they're not paying £5.80 an hour plus holiday pay etc. Let's round that up to £6, and say I would have taken five minutes to pay at a till, that's a saving of 50p for the company. If I save 10p on my sweet potatoes by putting them through as normal potatoes, they're still gaining 40p. So why don't you go tell everyone who has gone to a manned checkout that they're elevating prices and you demand that they all pay the company 40p for every five minutes of checking out time they require to ensure that you pay rock bottom prices for your tins of beans?
And what's more, that's exactly what you would be charged with, if they caught you. And it's highly unlikely that you'd get off with a plea of absent-mindedness (if such a plea ever stands up in court: I don't know)...vernon said:That is a verbiose attempt at justifying theft.
See how far your justification would get you in a magistrates' court.
wafflycat said:I refuse to use them. Not because of the technology but it strikes me that those tills represent fewer jobs in corporations that make vast profits and can afford to be employing people without denting profits severely.