Shopping trolleys are transport?
Eveyone has raced shopping trolleys with your girlfriend s a passenger...... surely
Shopping trolleys are transport?
A short stretch of pavement allows me and my young daughter to cycle to school, as the alternative would be two right turns on and off the busy main road, not something I would contemplate for a five year old . I have taught her that pavement cycling is ok only if she goes slowly and gives way to pedestrians. I would ask what benefit is achieved by preventing us from doing this?
This could run and run Personally, it's wheeled transport, so, it belongs on the road. Don't know if it's just round here, but, lots of old, narrow pavements - plenty of scope for a twat on a bike to do a lot of damage, especially if he felt entitled to do it!
Where should the adult supervising the child ride?I don't have any issues with children cycling on the pavement but don't agree with adults using it, just my opinion.
Fine, provided that they are lit in accordance with the regulations (paging @mjr) and occupants are wearing helmets in case they fall out.What are your views on prams and wheelchairs being in the road?
There aren't any regulations for lighting them, are there?Fine, provided that they are lit in accordance with the regulations (paging @mjr) and occupants are wearing helmets in case they fall out.
I've seen them riding on the road alongside the child. Not 100% sure what I think of that but WGAFWhere should the adult supervising the child ride?
When Mr Meldrew goes to whatever replaced the SNAP meetings to rant about people cycling on the pavement it's all hands to the pump and there's crackdown squads of PCs and PCSOs roaming the area a few times before they report back to the next meeting, but when cyclists go there to complain about what's making the roads unsafe then it's always Somebody Else's Problems - nobber motorists are for the Roads Policing Unit in a faraway town to deal with, highway obstructions aren't really obstructions but something for the council parking enforcement officers who have their hands full in the town centre.The local population will have identified that as a priority, hence the police spending time on it now and again. Surely you can't be upset that they're delivering that which the public have requested?
My problem with the article is that nowhere does it mention that pavement cycling is legal where a local authority has redetermined the pavement to shared use. The article reinforces the mistaken, yet widely held, belief that all pavement riding is illegal.
I use it as a solution in a couple of places where the alternative is two right turns across a busy road or cycle along a quiet wide footway that the council have failed to redesignate due to cost or Mr Meldrews.Yes, if cycling on pavements is a problem, identify what pavement cycling is the solution to and work to eliminate that.
Seriously, it isn't. Any policing of traffic other than cyclists is ruled out of bounds. It's a much better idea for cycling campaigners to get involved with the Casualty Reduction Partnerships if they want to get police help with tackling dangerous motorists and ideally get cyclist policing taken away from neighbourhood policing teams too.Get a few more cyclists to fill out the forms/attend the meetings/whatever method the local plod use to determine the community policing priorities. It's simply a numbers game, and if the cyclists ain't making up the numbers...
Maybe your constabulary was different or maybe it was an earlier incarnation than SNAP with a different scope.Seriously, it is. I used to be one of the poor schmucks that used to have to hob nob with the public gathering such info.