Here, for the wont of it, some things we can agree on:
- We all need to travel less
- We all need to use less finite resources
- Cycling is great. Driving a vehicle with an engine is less great.
Everyone still with me?
Oi, you at the back. Okay?
The rest is all about education, isn’t it? To convince everyone to shift habits, let go of perceived “right” ways to do things.
Personally, I’m involved in forestry management, and changing land use from marginal to woodland. And for a good few years was involved in biomass - producing the stuff, and later developing large-scale adoption of biomass systems at a local authority / sub-regional level.
The politicians, strategists and accountants were not convinced then, and, from what I hear from outside the tent now, they are still unconvinced. There is quite a lot wrong with power generation - none of it is truly sustainable globally. Not until we stop using power.
Much of the biomass for Drax and Ferrybridge is coming as woodchip from Canada. We would need an area of biomass equivalent to three Yorkshires to provide the woody mass needed for the output. It can’t be done.
Personally, I’m faced with the only skills I have now - building walls or building timber frames - and have to get there with the only means I have - an old diesel pick up is all I can afford. I’m faced with having to change if I want to stop pouring money down the drain and carbon into the ether: but where are the incentives, where is the help, what else can I do. Answers on a postcard, please. Or you could all just keep throwing data at one another from your trenches.
Why are Polestars so big.
Why isn’t a company building small, simple hydrogen powered 2CVs or similar?
Aren’t EVs just green washing, and pandering to the car / oil / investment companies needs?
I dont know the answers, before you shoot me down.