Smidgaf - video - would you report this

[col]

Divinitive, maybe.

Illiterate trolls make you comfortable in the way that sitting on a public transport seat warm and wet with fresh urine makes you comfortable. Festive, even.

Sounds tickly? How often do you enjoy sitting in peoples Urine then? Sounds a bit fetishist, in YOUR own way

 

[lukesdad]

Divinitive, maybe.

Illiterate trolls make you comfortable in the way that sitting on a public transport seat warm and wet with fresh urine makes you comfortable. Festive, even.

Oh dear the slippery slope..........

 

[lukesdad]

Lets look at the evidence dawesome has produced shall we and interpret it another way ? As many as 25% of cyclists could be to blame for collisions and as low as 60% of motorists. Now lets equate that to journeys undertaken. A conservative estimate would be 10 fold more journeys by car ? So collisions per journey could read 25 % of cyclists to blame and 6% of motorists ? But wait we havn t even considered the time spent doing the journey yet ?

 

[dawesome]

It's not judged by number of journeys, it's ACCIDENTS, stats 19 questions don't include

"How many times have you cycled this week?"

[Edited by Admin]

 

[lukesdad]

Lets look at the evidence dawesome has produced shall we and interpret it another way ? As many as 25% of cyclists could be to blame for collisions and as low as 60% of motorists. Now lets equate that to journeys undertaken. A conservative estimate would be 10 fold more journeys by car ? So collisions per journey could read 25 % of cyclists to blame and 6% of motorists ? But wait we havn t even considered the time spent doing the journey yet ?

I may have got the maths wrong but you get the idea

 

[lukesdad]

It's not judged by number of journeys, it's ACCIDENTS, stats 19 questions don't include

"How many times have you cycled this week?"

Really thats nice isnt it So judging by time spent using the public highway who causes the greater percentage of collisions ?

[Quote edited by Admin]

 

[lukesdad]

Ah selective evidence
^^^^shall I give you a clue ?

 

[dawesome]

Use more smileys.

No, post:

"Ah ha! So I win this argument!!!"

[Edited by Admin]

 

[lukesdad]

Argument ? Bye bye dullsome, come back when you ve grown up !

 

[fenlandpsychocyclist]

Argument ? Bye bye dullsome, come back when you ve grown up !

Kids eh?

 

[Norm]

Edited by Admin - original post removed

That's pretty offensive isn't it. I thought such things had died in the 1970s.

 

[dawesome]

Really thats nice isnt it So judging by time spent using the public highway who causes the greater percentage of collisions ?

No idea. Got any stats?

 

[Shaun]

Let's have some calm and reasoned discussion in this thread from here on in please - and no more personal insults or it will be locked.

Thank you.

 

[lukesdad]

No idea. Got any stats?

You have allready provided the stats I think you re ducking the answer now.

 

[Jezston]

Wow, looks like I missed a whole load of internet drama. Thank goodness.

Well done guys, it appears you've successfully trolled at least one person to breaking point.

If you don't understand the research and results by TFL/DFT, I suggest you contact them to ask them further questions as they are in a better position to answer your questions than any of us.

I'm out.