I've learnt a few things here tonight other than why not to feed wild animals.
Can anyone recommend a good hammer and chisel? I need to remove the HT2 BB from my LWR (/LIghtweight Revolution) carbon bike with a 15-sproket and motorbike chain. Like the one in my avatar.
Shall I go for ball-peen? sledge? club? cold? bolster?
Already asked here - are you also the kinda binary slayer that either slams with all power available, either lays down the hammer gently, with nothing inbetween?
One can freely choose a hammer, and a force, to a need.
I also already asked before, no answer yet, if one wants to rout out the chance of a tube breaking, one can redesign its wall thicker, as to provide a larger strength safety margin, to cope with any human leg power / weight cases.
Just a thicker wall for the tube.
For ex, instead of 130 grammes weight win relative to square taper, 110 gram weight win = 20 grammes extra steel to distribute the torsion force > stress over, as to stay safe below the treshold to formation of a defect.
It's also an idea to concentrate that extra material only around a specific position on the circumference:
https://www.dajinprecision.com/customize-cnc-turning-aerospace-parts/eccentric-hollow-shaft
With in this bicycle application that position related to the left cranks position where most riders force peaks (pedal position, what is it, 60°? to the vertical).
It could add abit to the manufacturing cost, but Safety Goes First, they say, and a sudden pedal axle breaking, or a crank delaminating, is a recipe for disaster.
The first time my Octalink left crank came loose, was early in the going up of a bridge, so force not that much more. But if it had happened on its hardest place, and in a return with luggage, I could have made an ugly smack.
Ofcourse, that then served as a warning, so I regularly stopped to see if I could tension the bolt, thereby seriously reducing the risk of it coming loose while riding.
You stated earlier that this happens one in a million, and that what is reported on the internet is not representative for the whole, which can be true, but that crank delaminating story also went from a few via alot to so many that Shimano was forced to do something (recall) to calm down the unrest in its public. Much like car makers, for a one in a million.
If the argument Safety Above All is used elsewhere (including food, animal flu and so on, where entire production batches or cattle are destroyed), bikes branche shouldn't be an exception. A similar such developing story was/are the cargo bikes.
And, the delaminating hollow crank story didn't start with their introduction, since the reported ones didn't start there, indicating, or even proving, that Shimano changed
something "on the way". The same can apply to these spindle breaks. Who knows what they all changed during the production over the years - they didn't publish it for the crank case.
Which is rather disturbing, since it means that instead of thoroughly testing design/material changes, Shimano uses its customers as lab monkeys to test effects of drugs on.