Interesting run of comment. Clearly some people are nervous of close passes, although if you are able to ride in a reasonably straight line there should be no problem.
?
The same could be said about close passes by cars.......
Interesting run of comment. Clearly some people are nervous of close passes, although if you are able to ride in a reasonably straight line there should be no problem.
?
2698831 said:What sort of legislation do you envisage?
Clearly some people are nervous of close passes
It is. With close passes, the chance of a collision occurring is higher. Unless the cyclists know each other, neither can be sure about the other's ability to hold a straight line, so close passes are risky.You say that as if it is a bad thing.
No idea, but looking back there has been none that made things easier!2698831 said:What sort of legislation do you envisage?
I dislike the whole sportive concept. I'd do a local ride to support something or other but not these pretend races. There does seem to be a whole lot of 'em organised over the past couple of years.
One of the biggest(if not the biggest sportive here) did just this via facebook/twitter and leaflets in the registration pack.few in my local club bother with the local sportive rides; why pay £30 to ride a route we can do on a club run for the princly sum of £12 per year?
maybe sportive organisers should issue some etiquette advice on how to ride in groups when the place is booked…
Yes they do seem to be taking off quite well, and the demand is outstripping supply. But please don't call them a race, how can we get the general public to accept them as a "run ride" (same concept as the fun runs I used to take part in), if we (the people who should know) refer to them as races.