Jameshow
Guru
The early 747s (-100 Series) relied on the curvature of the earth to get airborne as it was.
I can vouch for that I wonder how this bird would get up it rattled like 20yo bus before it got up in the air!!
The early 747s (-100 Series) relied on the curvature of the earth to get airborne as it was.
Their problem was not the wings, but the engines, that provided barely enough thrust to get the 747 into the air.Not their wings?
Umm, I thought it was Sky Hooks? 🤔Not their wings?
SKYHOOK invented by Heinz Erwin Frick, test pilot at BAe, and with specification No. 2104014, which was filed with the British Patent office in 1982?Umm, I thought it was Sky Hooks? 🤔![]()
SKYHOOK invented by Heinz Erwin Frick, test pilot at BAe, and with specification No. 2104014, which was filed with the British Patent office in 1982?
Nah, the plane takes off, hooks up and waits whilst the earth rotates below it, innit?
Mare of mine had an interesting theory. Flights UK to Aus for instance, way over 12 hours and an extraordinary amount of fuel.
So why not develop an 'aircraft' that can just make geostationary orbit...then sit wait for Aus to come to it..in 12 hours
(Not serious but....)
If it was in geostationary orbit then it would remain over its takeoff site!
Honestly, there's always someone who has to spoil everything with that "Science" stuff...