DaveReading
Don't suffer fools gladly (must try harder!)
- Location
- Reading, obvs
Their problem was not the wings, but the engines, that provided barely enough thrust to get the 747 into the air.Not their wings?
And were prone to blowing up ....
Their problem was not the wings, but the engines, that provided barely enough thrust to get the 747 into the air.Not their wings?
Umm, I thought it was Sky Hooks? 🤔Not their wings?

SKYHOOK invented by Heinz Erwin Frick, test pilot at BAe, and with specification No. 2104014, which was filed with the British Patent office in 1982?Umm, I thought it was Sky Hooks? 🤔![]()
SKYHOOK invented by Heinz Erwin Frick, test pilot at BAe, and with specification No. 2104014, which was filed with the British Patent office in 1982?
Nah, the plane takes off, hooks up and waits whilst the earth rotates below it, innit?
Mare of mine had an interesting theory. Flights UK to Aus for instance, way over 12 hours and an extraordinary amount of fuel.
So why not develop an 'aircraft' that can just make geostationary orbit...then sit wait for Aus to come to it..in 12 hours
(Not serious but....)
If it was in geostationary orbit then it would remain over its takeoff site!
Honestly, there's always someone who has to spoil everything with that "Science" stuff...
Honestly, there's always someone who has to spoil everything with that "Science" stuff...
AT least they made an attempt and got the front wheel off the ground
B52s don;t even try!!!
they just keep going in a straight line
T'weren't mine but @ebikeerwidnes who's post you quoted.Bicycle landing gear meant they couldn't 'rotate' the angle of attack for takeoff, so the USAF had special runways built (or older ones extended) to let them build up enough speed to take off in level flight. There used to be a "JATO" rocket-assisted takeoff package that could be installed to allow them to use shorter runways, but those were abandoned long ago. So it's entirely possible for a B-52 to safely land on a runway it can't then take off from.