The plane enthusiasts thread

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

DaveReading

Don't suffer fools gladly (must try harder!)
Location
Reading, obvs
Not their wings?
Their problem was not the wings, but the engines, that provided barely enough thrust to get the 747 into the air.

And were prone to blowing up ....
 

Joey Shabadoo

My pronouns are "He", "Him" and "buggerlugs"
The Jaguar was a bit like that, underpowered.

img_76-1.jpg


They abandoned trials to navalise it after this one spent 30 minutes trying to catch up with the carrier.
 

midlife

Legendary Member
Looking at that carrier, the original Buccaneer was so underpowered it couldn’t take off with a lot of fuel ….so took off the carrier with half empty tanks and used in flight refueling near the carrier to finish the job
 

gbb

Squire
Location
Peterborough
Nah, the plane takes off, hooks up and waits whilst the earth rotates below it, innit?

Mare of mine had an interesting theory. Flights UK to Aus for instance, way over 12 hours and an extraordinary amount of fuel.
So why not develop an 'aircraft' that can just make geostationary orbit...then sit wait for Aus to come to it..in 12 hours

(Not serious but....)
 

figbat

Former slippery scientist
Mare of mine had an interesting theory. Flights UK to Aus for instance, way over 12 hours and an extraordinary amount of fuel.
So why not develop an 'aircraft' that can just make geostationary orbit...then sit wait for Aus to come to it..in 12 hours

(Not serious but....)

If it was in geostationary orbit then it would remain over its takeoff site!
 

gbb

Squire
Location
Peterborough
Screenshot_20250906_225842_Gallery.jpg


A distant Chipmunk today. Used to see them all the time in the 70s, living on an airbase, dad used to work on them.

Also a (I believe) NAmerican T6 Texan, often doing the rounds around here, heard but not seen. Radial.engines are quite distinct so a good chance it was him on the other side of a treeline.
 
Top Bottom