Funny you should say that - twice I have finished the book to find that the film was on the telly the following night.
Now that's just a glitch in the matrix.
Funny you should say that - twice I have finished the book to find that the film was on the telly the following night.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083658/faq#.2.1.50 OMG!
In the end we're all guessing, because the truth is that they made it up as they went along. Isn't that the charm of it?
Is it true that Rutger Hauer improvised 'the' speech?
I am broad agreement with your assesment, but with a couple of comments.
Re 2. Gaff is just a copper, not a blade runner, but he has access to Deckard's implanted memories, hence the origami unicorn.
Re 3. Both Ridley Scott and Rutger Hauer have a different interpretation for why Roy saves Deckard.
I am broad agreement with your assesment, but with a couple of comments.
Re 4. I understood this comment to mean that neither Rachel nor Deckard had much time left (inception dates).
according to Rutger himself, he made up Roy's final speech because he felt Roy needed to say something.
As for deckard being a replicant... i think the clues are there if you look hard enough, but it would never get through court. All this 'proof' is a result of film buffs talking too much and looking too closely. If i watched The Wizard of Oz close enough I'm sure i could prove Dorothy was a replicant too.
Interestingly, the original script does ...
but the red shoes (that replaced the silver shoes in the book) are about the menarche. AllegedlyThe Wizard of Oz is in fact an allegory of the American monetary system (see here).
and a far better film!Other Phillip K Dick stories that have been made into movies: Total Recall aka "We can remember it for you wholeasale"
but the red shoes (that replaced the silver shoes in the book) are about the menarche. Allegedly
dunno, matey. I've never made it to the end.What about the film 'The Red Shoes' by Powell and Pressburger? Is that about the menarche too?