What film did you watch last night?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Profpointy

Legendary Member
It's almost as if you wrote the script yourself 🤣

To be fair isn't there the theory that there are only 7 basic plots ?
 

ianrauk

Tattooed Beat Messiah
Location
Rides Ti2
Xeno.
Teenage girl befriends an alien that crashed down on earth. Like ET but this alien is more akin to 'Alien Xenomorph' rather then the tubby little flump in Spielberg's movie.
Proved to be a good watch.
MV5BMTdkODIzYmUtNWJhMS00NWQyLWEyYTEtMmUyMWY0YWM4Yzg4XkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_QL75_UY281_CR0,0,190,281_...jpg
 

wafter

I like steel bikes and I cannot lie..
Location
Oxford
28 Years Later: The Bone Temple.

Went with a mate who wanted to see this fourth instalment of the 28 Days Later series. I was skeptical from the off since it followed the last one quite rapidly and the title makes it sound like a sketchy half-arsed spin-off... sadly watching it confirmed that it was pretty much a sketchy half-arsed spin-off.

Granted I've not seen the third (but love the first and quite like the second) but in isolation it just wasn't very good. While it had the odd moment it generally seemed disjointed and directionless; unfeasible and plot-holed, gratuitiously graphic and sadistic (not bothered with zombies eating people, more bothered by people torturing people - especially when not underpinned by the gravitas of being part of a decent film).

Obviously if you're going to smack four films out of the zombie genre they have to progress beyond the initial apocalyptic event, but I'm not a fan of the way this has gone. I think this detracts from the franchise and the tie in to the first film at the end just feels like a cheap shot at redeeming it by association.

Unlike the viserally arresting first film this didn't really engage me on any level other than "oh, that's not very pleasant".

It apparently reviewed well (7.6 on IMDB) but I was far from impressed. 4/10; would not recommend.
 

C R

Guru
Location
Worcester
28 Years Later: The Bone Temple.

Went with a mate who wanted to see this fourth instalment of the 28 Days Later series. I was skeptical from the off since it followed the last one quite rapidly and the title makes it sound like a sketchy half-arsed spin-off... sadly watching it confirmed that it was pretty much a sketchy half-arsed spin-off.

Granted I've not seen the third (but love the first and quite like the second) but in isolation it just wasn't very good. While it had the odd moment it generally seemed disjointed and directionless; unfeasible and plot-holed, gratuitiously graphic and sadistic (not bothered with zombies eating people, more bothered by people torturing people - especially when not underpinned by the gravitas of being part of a decent film).

Obviously if you're going to smack four films out of the zombie genre they have to progress beyond the initial apocalyptic event, but I'm not a fan of the way this has gone. I think this detracts from the franchise and the tie in to the first film at the end just feels like a cheap shot at redeeming it by association.

Unlike the viserally arresting first film this didn't really engage me on any level other than "oh, that's not very pleasant".

It apparently reviewed well (7.6 on IMDB) but I was far from impressed. 4/10; would not recommend.

I haven't seen the movie, but I've seen the scene where they dance to The Number of the Beast. A bit meh.
 

ianrauk

Tattooed Beat Messiah
Location
Rides Ti2
Each to their own and all that, I watched the Bone Temple last night and thought it was brilliant. But then again I'm a sucker for a zombie flick.
Ralph Fienns is absolutely brilliant and I'm a big fan of Jack O'Connell.
Roll on part 5.
 

wafter

I like steel bikes and I cannot lie..
Location
Oxford
Reminds me I've still not gone to see this, I better get my skates on as I think it'll disappear soon.

Apparently it's not done great in the cinema, so the 5th film is in doubt.
Yes, my mate had been wanting to watch it for a while and I think it's probably nearing its the end of its run. Will be interesting to hear what you think if you do see it.

Each to their own and all that, I watched the Bone Temple last night and thought it was brilliant. But then again I'm a sucker for a zombie flick.
Ralph Fienns is absolutely brilliant and I'm a big fan of Jack O'Connell.
Roll on part 5.
Apparently it's certainly divisive :tongue:

I love the genre too (28DL and the original Dawn of the Dead are two of my favourite films). To me the Bone Temple just smacks of trying to push the concept beyond its natural viable limits. A bit like the Walking Dead - was transfixed by that when it came out; made it to what, series 7 and just found it increasingly far-fetched, unrewarding repetitive and difficult to get into.

Agree about the acting - can't really criticise that, or the production... my issue is really the core story and quality of the writing.

You have to watch the whole movie to understand the context of that clip
This is true, but even then I think it was a bit clunky and cringe-inducing... however maybe that was intentional given the context.

100% this. I'm gonna sound like such a film w*nker here, but everything in Bone Temple makes sense.

It's not a spinoff. One more and I reckon Garland walks away.
Without getting into particulars that might spolit for others, even if you like the general story I still think it was full of plot holes while the some of the characters were pretty shallow and on occasion their behaviour made little sense.

The concepts all seemed rational (the feral kids, pseudo-religeous cults, doctor trying to find a cure etc) but I didn't much like the way a lot of these manifested.


Having slept on it I feel a little less hostile towards it this morning, but still certainly wouldn't bother watching it again.
 
Top Bottom