GrumpyGregry
Here for rides.
Mort feels you don't have a choice.Pardon?
You, I'm pleased to say, recognise that you do.
Mort feels you don't have a choice.Pardon?
Mort feels you don't have a choice.
You, I'm pleased to say, recognise that you do.
To be fair, many people are thoroughly píssed off if someone damages their bike.
Mort feels you don't have a choice.
You, I'm pleased to say, recognise that you do.
Mort feels you don't have a choice.
You, I'm pleased to say, recognise that you do.
I know! I was reiterating for emphasis!That was my point!
I wonder why are cars such a special case? Other items get damaged and no one carps on about their resale value; it's just seen as wear and tear as long as the item still works. Maybe that's just in my world - if so, I know where I'd rather live.
No. The OP had an undamaged car; if he had wanted it damaged he had the choice of doing it himself or purchasing a damaged one but no he didn't. Therefore it can be concluded that undamaged was the state in which he liked his car to be. The fact someone came along and damaged it meant that in order to have a car in the state he liked it the OP had no choice but to have it repaired. There is no element of free choice other than the obvious one in that the OP liked his car to be in an undamaged state, as most of us would.
Things, especially left unattended can indeed get damaged accidentally, or, deliberately. But a car is different, one that suffers what appears to be negligible damage will cost a disproportionate amount of money to put right and it will significantly harm it's resale value.
It's why I drive a Jeep.
As has been said; hell is other people (and the consequences to us of the free choices they make.)...within the constraints imposed by the person who damaged his car.
No. The OP had an undamaged car; if he had wanted it damaged he had the choice of doing it himself or purchasing a damaged one but no he didn't. Therefore it can be concluded that undamaged was the state in which he liked his car to be. The fact someone came along and damaged it meant that in order to have a car in the state he liked it the OP had no choice but to have it repaired. There is no element of free choice other than the obvious one in that the OP liked his car to be in an undamaged state, as most of us would.
Exactly, and my choice is to repair the car because:
a) I do intend to sell it eventually.
b) I always look after my things because it pays in the long run and it is the way I am.