What happened to decency?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Globalti

Legendary Member
I've forgotten what this argument is about.
 

asterix

Comrade Member
Location
Limoges or York
Mort feels you don't have a choice.
You, I'm pleased to say, recognise that you do.

No. The OP had an undamaged car; if he had wanted it damaged he had the choice of doing it himself or purchasing a damaged one but no he didn't. Therefore it can be concluded that undamaged was the state in which he liked his car to be. The fact someone came along and damaged it meant that in order to have a car in the state he liked it the OP had no choice but to have it repaired. There is no element of free choice other than the obvious one in that the OP liked his car to be in an undamaged state, as most of us would.
 

asterix

Comrade Member
Location
Limoges or York
just putting this next to GG's thread..
 

MarkF

Guru
Location
Yorkshire
I wonder why are cars such a special case? Other items get damaged and no one carps on about their resale value; it's just seen as wear and tear as long as the item still works. Maybe that's just in my world - if so, I know where I'd rather live.

Things, especially left unattended can indeed get damaged accidentally, or, deliberately. But a car is different, one that suffers what appears to be negligible damage will cost a disproportionate amount of money to put right and it will significantly harm it's resale value.

It's why I drive a Jeep.
 

Dan B

Disengaged member
No. The OP had an undamaged car; if he had wanted it damaged he had the choice of doing it himself or purchasing a damaged one but no he didn't. Therefore it can be concluded that undamaged was the state in which he liked his car to be. The fact someone came along and damaged it meant that in order to have a car in the state he liked it the OP had no choice but to have it repaired. There is no element of free choice other than the obvious one in that the OP liked his car to be in an undamaged state, as most of us would.

Finger on the button there. I said exactly the same thing about my sofa, but the w*nker who ripped it and spilled Coke on the cushion just said I shouldn't have left it parked on the road outside my house
 

asterix

Comrade Member
Location
Limoges or York
Things, especially left unattended can indeed get damaged accidentally, or, deliberately. But a car is different, one that suffers what appears to be negligible damage will cost a disproportionate amount of money to put right and it will significantly harm it's resale value.

It's why I drive a Jeep.

It's why I drive an ancient and battered van. Driving through Paris last time was a doddle, apart from anything else being RHD means you are on the same side as the drivers next to you and can converse more easily.
 

GrumpyGregry

Here for rides.
No. The OP had an undamaged car; if he had wanted it damaged he had the choice of doing it himself or purchasing a damaged one but no he didn't. Therefore it can be concluded that undamaged was the state in which he liked his car to be. The fact someone came along and damaged it meant that in order to have a car in the state he liked it the OP had no choice but to have it repaired. There is no element of free choice other than the obvious one in that the OP liked his car to be in an undamaged state, as most of us would.

really, though? What does the OP say?
Exactly, and my choice is to repair the car because:
a) I do intend to sell it eventually.
b) I always look after my things because it pays in the long run and it is the way I am.
 
Top Bottom