Oh dear, my steed is a Giant Escape 1. At £499, I do not even scrape into entry level .... I shall crawl away quietly,
Even worse, Mrs @BoldonLad has a Liv at only £399.... I am such a cheapskate!
I am certain I'd never get top ten in the TdF on any bike no matter the cost or quality. Even in my prime.Entry level means that whilst you might place top ten on it you will not win the TDF.
That is nothing compared to my shame! My son's 'entry level' red Triban 3 was ONLY £200 and was further reduced to £150 a week or two after we bought his. How will I ever explain this to him when he is older? He may just disown me.......Oh dear, my steed is a Giant Escape 1. At £499, I do not even scrape into entry level .... I shall crawl away quietly,
Even worse, Mrs @BoldonLad has a Liv at only £399.... I am such a cheapskate!
That is nothing compared to my shame! My son's 'entry level' red Triban 3 was ONLY £200 and was further reduced to £150 a week or two after we bought his. How will I ever explain this to him when he is older? He may just disown me.......
He wanted a new group set.Poor deprived child.... how could you?
It seems bikes under the £1k category are "entry-level". What makes them so? So what if they have a sora drivetrain instead of something "higher" up?
I would go so far as to say the more expensive bikes are "entry-level" because they are (I think?) more comfortable? The frames are smoother to ride, more bump absorption, etc. The comfortable ride would suit the starter bike rider.
In contrast, the cheaper bikes are for more experienced riders since they will ride everywhere, lock it up on the street, and so on. And take messengers for example, their bikes all seem "entry-level" but I think they are well thought out, reliable, reasonably cheap to replace if anything goes wrong. Those guys have it sussed. I'm hankering after the cheapest bike I can get away with, not the most expensive that I can afford.
Entry-level bikes is the language of journalists. That's got me thinking about "entry level" journalism.
http://felixwong.com/2010/11/tour-de-france-bicycles-historical-bike-weights/To days so called entry level bikes would have been capable of being ridden to victory in the past To victory in major races.
Interesting stats. Up to 1993 all the winning bikes weighed over 20lb, that's what would today be described as disappointingly heavy on anything costing seven or eight hundred quid.
Lots of other things were acceptable prior to 1993 also. Would we like to go back to that, I think not.Interesting stats. Up to 1993 all the winning bikes weighed over 20lb, that's what would today be described as disappointingly heavy on anything costing seven or eight hundred quid.
MichaelW2 said:I regard "entry level" as a step up from BSO, a bike good enough to ride everyday.
You can expect a call from Social Services!That is nothing compared to my shame! My son's 'entry level' red Triban 3 was ONLY £200 and was further reduced to £150 a week or two after we bought his. How will I ever explain this to him when he is older? He may just disown me.......