jezhiggins
Well-Known Member
- Location
- Birmingham
Wolf04 said:It was a stupid ill conceived overtake.
You shoud not have hit the van, it is asking for the situation to esculate.
The driver should not have then agressively used his vehicle as a weapon to "teach you a lesson".
It's not always easy to think rationally about these things though, is it?

A few weeks ago I was cycling to school with my 8 year old son. We were passed by a van, while we were passing between parked cars on both sides of the road and approaching a junction. He'd actually been waiting behind us, but seeing the end of the road seemed to spur him into action. I did slap the van. Hard. It wasn't a rational decision, it was a "what the hell are you doing you murderous idiot" decision. There wasn't enough room width ways, there wasn't enough room ahead of us, if any traffic turned into the road there was nowhere for it go, it was just a wrong decision in every way.
He slammed on the brakes and asked me what "my problem was" and to tell me I had "loads of room". I may not have made a huge amount of sense, but tried to suggest that if I could hit his van then perhaps he was a shade too close, what with the narrowness of the road, the junction, the bikes. "Now you're just being silly", he replied. He did, at that point, seem geniunely bewildered. I tried very hard to not swear or to directly insult him, but I was absolutely furious, and the conversation became rather heated. When he asked me "what are you going to do about it?", I realised that I had to stop or I was going to thump him, a lot, and I don't really want to think about how that might have gone.
In retrospect I suspect my slapping the van made him think he had actually run into me and gave him a fright. Maybe when he's telling his mates at work about the stupid cyclist who ranted at him over nothing, he'll remember that frightened feeling too.