DefBref
Über Member
- Location
- Whitehaven
I'm sorry Adrian, I don't understand your question. Could you elaborate?
AND as a short haired old fart it keeps the sun off me bonce....
I've banged my head more times falling off bikes than I ever have or will doing all other activities put together..
Common sense! Yay!Two things from me.
Firstly, comparing cycling in the UK to Holland is ridiculous. There's no need to wear a helmet in holland, due to the fantastic cycle infastructure and massively high bike usage there's very little chance of an RTA compared to the UK. Plus the vast majority of bikes are steel jobbies that potter about at 10mph.
I'm also at a loss as to how anyone can say wearing a helmet doesn't protect you in any way. Even if it's a small amount then it's better to wear one surely? It takes seconds to put one on and take off and makes no difference to a ride.
Maybe someone wants to try simulating an impact test? Put a helmet on and give it a crack with a house brick. Then take it off and do the the same, and come back and say which hurt the most.
If that's not a good enough test, try running into a wall head first both with and without.
I don't care if somebody else doesn't want to wear a helmet, it's none of my business. But don't call people 'sheep' or 'brainwashed' when common sense tells you they must offer at least some protection.
I pointed it out and the claim fell short of what they would consider pursuing , the main fact that makes me wear a helmet is i would get more of a ear bashing off swmbo than i would smacking into a vehicle if i didnt .yes, we've all seen these type of reports and with headphones too. Did you contribute to the wider problem with your solicitor by playing along with the question or point out that no cycling helmet would quite reach your hip where the impact was and why was s/he fixated on protecting an undamaged part of your body but not asking why you weren't in full motorcycle leathers on your cycle or using some form of body armour that could be relevant to the area of impact you mention?
I don't wear one all the time but on the road yes I do and the reason is not only for safety its because if some numpty knocks me off my bike and we end up in court the first thing some parasite solicitor will say is "so Mr B at the time of the accident were you wearing a safety helmet" and it'll go downhill from there .I thought these helmet threads were banned in here these days?
When I was a kid we were constantly falling off bikes, falling out of trees and falling off home made trolleys (remember them?) in massed crashes. We would be covered in cuts, bruises and scabs, especially on knees and elbows, but I can't remember anyone ever having even a light head injury.
When I see little kids out pootling about on little bikes wearing helmets I find it so feckin sad and depressing.
Fair enough wise old elf .It wasn't Fabio Casartelli's death in 1995, it was Andrey Kivilev's in 2003 that prompted the UCI to mandate helmets.
The helmets the pros wear are hideously non aero. They have highly aero alternatives but are fiercly conservative.Given fabio casartelli`s death i doubt the uci will repeal the ruling they made regarding helmets and arent the new helmet more aero than caps these days so i doubt the pro teams will drop them given the marginal gains that seem to be in lately.
A cap does the job nicely. Sometimes I take one off and my hair looks way better than before the ride!they are good for covering your bad hair do on the way to work