We ran a race commuter challenge over a five-mile route from Gowerton to Swansea City Centre. I (road cyclist) won it came in first. Not far behind me was a kick-bike (scooter with 700c wheels). Two more bikes (using bike paths) came in next. Then two runners. The the guy on the train. Then the guy in the car. The guy on the bus admittedly came last, but that's because all the f***ing cars were in the way.
No motorcycle in this mix then for totally unbiased comparison - that's why you didn't come second in this 'contest' then.
Last time I was in Swansea, they had a few bus lanes. The bus passenger likely took as long as they did because the buses stop to pick people up every 1/4 mile. Had they done the run without stopping, and used the bus lanes, they would have likely beaten all the other modes - including the cars - you are very economical with the truth when it suits
Yet you manage to run a car and motorbike. Priorities linf, priorities.
If you are asking me to justify why I didn't sell the family car or a motorbike I waited 7 years to acquire when my Giant Roadie was pinched you really are a plank User482
I cycle for leisure. I'm not trying to save the planet, or 'prove' that other modes of transport are rubbish. Each has its strengths, and weaknesses.
This is the way I see it if you are at all hard of reasoning:-
Around town, and using all the short cuts, if the cycle of traffic lights are against the cars, a bicycle does it every time. Mix town and open road, the motorbike wins every time (no shadow of a doubt). Pissing down rain, or stuff to lug around, the car wins every time.
I apply that logic as I'm no masochist when it comes to getting from A to B.
The car is just transport which the lifestyle of my family goes a long way in dicating, The cycle and motorcycle are fun which I can take or leave when conditions determine that they aren't.
Is this clear enough ?