I know I'm stating the mind bogglingly obvious but there needs to be a major development in bike security, both in portable locking and deterent devices and in the type of secure locking facilities available. Of course all of this must be achieved without any disruption to cyclists or anything which might deter people from taking up cycling.
Is that too much to ask? I've got the ball rolling by identifying what is needed so the hard work is mostly done. I hope someone out there can just fill in the blanks.
I'm not sure it is that obvious and I'm not sure I agree.
Most taxpayers probably think that enough has been done. I would agree that there could be more provision of cycle racks in populated areas, but not that they need to offer greater security. I'm not sure how they could and what the benefit would be if they could.
As to portable locking devices, the industry will provide what the market can bear. Cycle locks have become more resistant to tampering, more expensive and (in some cases) bigger and heavier in the years I've been riding. People seem far more excercised about security than they were 30, 20 or even ten tears ago. A lot is spent on locks, but things still seem to be stolen.
The average bicycle is now more expensive, more 'desirable' and perhaps more easily sold by a thief than it was a decade or two ago. £2000 bicycles are now commonplace. I'm an enthusiastic rider, but my most expensive bike was £1000. Others I have are worth a fraction of that.
A thief who takes a £3000 car has a lot to get rid of, much of it traceable. The car is highly visible in transit and has identifying markers all over it.
A thief in a Transit can take five £3000 bicycles quietly, invisibly and covertly. He then has little trouble dismantling the things and eBaying (or fencing) the stripped components.
I know which I'd go for if I wanted to make some money from theft.
Ultimately, I think your request/suggestion probably is 'too much to ask for'. The state won't do anything about making the cycle-parking infrastructure more secure, because there's no wider demand for it and even if there were it just wouldn't climb high enough up the priority sheet.
Industry may or may not do something about affordable increased security in portable devices, but that's more a question for the consumer.
Sorry, but I don't think it's high time anyone did anything.