[QUOTE 4266215, member: 45"]That's right. It's about the business model, and the customer deciding whether she's happy with it or not.
It's surprising how easily it slips into the moralistic. In the toilet scenario what it means is that for example (the families of) children will have to pay for the costs to make it cheaper for others.[/QUOTE]
I personally believe that children should have access to taxpayer subsidised toilet facilities, as well as water, food, education, healthcare and leisure facilities. I also agree that VAT should not be charged on children's clothes.
I don't extend this attitude towards subsidising, as a paying customer, their convenience and comfort whilst on holiday. Their parents should shoulder that burden.
This is all a bit silly though, since nobody actually thinks that Ryanair charging passengers to use the toilet is a good idea.