Another pathetic dim witted tweeting driver...

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

theclaud

Openly Marxist
Location
Swansea
But you are assuming people who may have never ridden a bike or have not done so for many years know about road position for cyclists. They may just think that they should keep as far to the left as possible at all times as that is what they were told as kids back in the 60's or 70's. So when they are driving along and a cyclist ahead looks behind at them and then takes a primary position because they are planning to turn right or something they may think they are just being awkward and get angry. I am all for riding with confidence and claiming the space we need, but that is they key point, the space we NEED, riding positively but not aggressively.

I'm not interested in their reasons for not thinking. They need to come to terms with the existence of other people.
 

classic33

Leg End Member
How about riding this in heavy traffic, on a 'A' road at rush hour? I have and do ride it. Light fitted at the request of the Police in Manchester, For riding it through Manchester.
Brox Mine.JPG
 

classic33

Leg End Member
I never asked for a list, I stated that there is no definitive list and your official source has proven this. Even the quote you have used backs this up as that too is very vague!

Actually there is no list of offences that can be issued an ASBO, it is up to the courts to decide if your behaviour warrents one, which is scary in itself! And if you look at what some have been issued for in the past you can see that cyclist can be in real danger, littering, swearing, rudeness, spitting etc!

I think people have missed what I was trying to say, my point was that we as the minority group participating in the riding two abreast cannot decide if it is or not anti social, rather it is society as a whole that decides that and so we need to educate people rather than wind them up by stubbornly keeping in the primary position when there is no need to and other such things as all that does is antagonist and leads to the sorts of incident we see on you tube!
Then
That's very vague and not a government site, there is not an official list because that would limit the use of them.
 

Zcapp96

Active Member
I'm not interested in their reasons for not thinking. They need to come to terms with the existence of other people.

So you don't care why they may not know how cyclists should ride safely (I would have thought we need to identify why motorists think the way they do to be able to effectively correct the problem but that might be just me) you just what them to magically acquire the knowledge without any education on it? This is too bizarre, I'm going to bed!
 

theclaud

Openly Marxist
Location
Swansea
So you don't care why they may not know how cyclists should ride safely (I would have thought we need to identify why motorists think the way they do to be able to effectively correct the problem but that might be just me) you just what them to magically acquire the knowledge without any education on it? This is too bizarre, I'm going to bed!

We already know why motorists think the way they do. There is no mystery to be solved.
 

Moodyman

Legendary Member
The guy in the pic on page 1 (number on his shirt)...not Michael Adu of this parish is it?
 

theclaud

Openly Marxist
Location
Swansea
I think people have missed what I was trying to say, my point was that we as the minority group participating in the riding two abreast cannot decide if it is or not anti social,

Riding alongside a companion antisocial? Are you typing that with a straight face?
 
Top Bottom