Cycling, a poor mans means of transport!

Is it?


  • Total voters
    127
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Current Bike - £250 new + upgrades
Current Trike - £800 2nd Hand
Current Car - £500 8th-hand
 

400bhp

Guru
Is running an even poorer means of transport?

I guess you need to split an activity into recreation or a means of transport.

Most running is done for recreation. So is a lot of cycling for that matter.

Clearly there is some overlap as well.

I'd class my commute as transport and recreation for example.
 

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
I guess you need to split an activity into recreation or a means of transport.

Most running is done for recreation. So is a lot of cycling for that matter.

Clearly there is some overlap as well.

I'd class my commute as transport and recreation for example.

I think there is so much overlap that there is often a complete dual use with cyclists. Even when riding as a means of transport it's also a recreation. Few commuters would say that they cycled purely to get to and from work.
 

Mr Haematocrit

msg me on kik for android
Poor and Wealthy is a term which is relative... Bill Gates would consider himself poor if he lost 80% of his personal fortune, while I would still consider him to be wealthy.
To the man who lives in a cardboard box behind kings cross station anyone with a bed and net connection is wealthy
 

Hacienda71

Mancunian in self imposed exile in leafy Cheshire
Some of the noveau-paupers who ride bicycles:



article-2000262-0C722EC100000578-282_634x680.jpg
Not sure it would be that easy to ride the bikes in the Branson pic as they have ne pedals! :whistle:
 

fossyant

Ride It Like You Stole It!
Location
South Manchester
These threads are a bit willy wavey aren't they.

I am not poor because of [insert amount spent on bike/car].

I find that a bit distasteful.

Heh heh. We need how fast are yer legs thread.
 

Pat "5mph"

A kilogrammicaly challenged woman
Moderator
Location
Glasgow
Ahemm .... What happened to the "poor" woman? Is she not going anywhere? :whistle:
Just kidding!
Really, before I started to read Cycle Chat, I thought one just jumps on the bike and goes, the only expense the bike itself.
Then I found out I need to put air in my tyres, get a pump ... then discover I really need a track pump.
Not allowed to cycle on the pavement, get lights for the road. Then discover any light won't do, get better ones.
Then discover any tyre won't do: get other ones, more grip, more vavawhumph, more money!
Brake pads need replaced regularly, what a discovery!
Then find out a day ticket for the bus costs a fortune if you give up your monthly one: need N+1 just in case N is off sick ... :wacko::wacko::wacko:
 

Crankarm

Guru
Location
Nr Cambridge
The cost of running a car is MUCH more expensive than cycling. Period. The fact that SOME bikes are expensive is irrelevant as most cyclists I suspect ride bikes worth considerably less than £500. The capital out lay for a car is far more than this and then you have the cost of insurance, tax, fuel, servicing and general maintenance. Cycling by comparison is significantly cheaper. I suspect there are drivers of cars and also cyclists who are equally tight or poor, likewise there are those who must have a top of the range expensive status symbol car or a plastic carbon bike to impress work mate or the neighbours. Cars and bikes are both expenses. For many I shoulld imagine it is solely about getting form A to B as cheaply and quickly as possible.
 
Top Bottom