neilb1906
Veteran
- Location
- Chelmsford, County Town of Ethics!
Mmm, I dont recall the organisers of the Tdf in the nineties getting so precious about reputation of the event when they let Virenque back in after the Festina affair to ride for Polti!
Your memory isn't that good, as they (ASO) did try to stop Virenque from racing, but the UCI (protectors of the dopers) told them they were too late in issuing the banMmm, I dont recall the organisers of the Tdf in the nineties getting so precious about reputation of the event when they let Virenque back in after the Festina affair to ride for Polti!
I’m just waiting for a statement from Cath Wiggins supporting ASO’s decision.In other breaking news on Froomey...
https://news.sky.com/story/michelle-froome-chris-will-ride-in-tour-de-france-11422843
Michelle says he's riding so I'm happy !
Genuine question, is that a UCI regulation or an ASO contract clause? Either way, it's wide enough for the lawyers to drive the Sky death star through.It would appear that the UCI regulation stating "The organiser may refuse permission to participate in – or exclude from – an event, a team or one of its members whose presence might be prejudicial to the image or reputation of the organiser or of the event." is something of a paper tiger.
Love it!Marc Madiot, FDJ boss quoted here
"It's political, courageous and logical, (But) it does not necessarily mean Froome will not be on the starting line-up. There is a judicial hearing and I trust my Anglo-Saxon friends will organise a strong defence,"

Thanks 'trousers.That's a UCI regulation. 2.2.010 Exclusion from Races
Although there are probably very similar clauses in ASO contracts.
Breaking News - UCI have cleared Chris Froome
That kinda whiffs.I guess that it would only go to CAS if there was still a dispute between Sky and the UCI.I thought it would be CAS, not the UCI who would need to do that?
Either way, not unexpected.