Rhythm Thief
Legendary Member
- Location
- Ross on Wye
I think we need a definition of "Hi Vis". When I say it, I mean something like one of those tabards builders and motorway workers (and lorry drivers) wear, in fluorescent yellow or orance with reflective strips all over them. The reflective strips are the single best aid to cyclist visibility after a good set of lights. I agree with Greg regarding an arrangement of lights, preferably a mix of flashing and constant, at each end, too: a single bright light isn't as good, since there's nothing to help a driver judge distance and it's easily mistaken for many other sources of bright light. F'rinstance, a bright constant front light looks remarkably similar to one of those security lights on the sides of houses; a bright constant rear light can look exactly like a red traffic light. Both real world examples. Flashing lights look like nothing else and mean you're instantly identified as a cyclist. I know there's a school of thought on here which believes that to be a bad thing, but I don't subscribe to that.
Regarding the OP, I'd say that most of the cyclists I "see" at night nowadays have no lights. I'm happy to drive in a way which accommodates such people, but if I ever do squish one - all too easily imaginable on a busy unlit A road in the dead of night - my first priority will be to try not to lose too much sleep over it.
Regarding the OP, I'd say that most of the cyclists I "see" at night nowadays have no lights. I'm happy to drive in a way which accommodates such people, but if I ever do squish one - all too easily imaginable on a busy unlit A road in the dead of night - my first priority will be to try not to lose too much sleep over it.