Kirstie
Über Member
papercorn2000 said:You are such a girl!
It's merely a chance to get your leg over!
and proud of it!
there are lots of different kinds of affair, 'merely getting your leg over' is just one version
papercorn2000 said:You are such a girl!
It's merely a chance to get your leg over!
Patrick Stevens said:What Spire wants is an overwhelming vote that copping a bj from Tracey in accounts at the office party is in no way an act of unfaithfulness. He's hoping that this will convince Mrs. Spire.
papercorn2000 said:I think you'll find that if you are male, there is only one!
Kirstie said:there are lots of different kinds of affair
papercorn2000 said:I think you'll find that if you are male, there is only one!
papercorn2000 said:I think you'll find that if you are male, there is only one!
Kirstie said:It's not the thinking about it it's the acting upon it. Unfaithfulness is where you create an alternative relationship - an alternative secret world with another person that you both enter into knowingly and reciprocally, even though one or both of you is already in a relationship. This can work on physical and emotional levels...which is why fantasy isn't being unfaithful...it doesn't involve acting upon your feelings ansd them being reciprocated.
Kirstie said:i really hope that one day i wake up and 'find that i'm male' ... so i could go on a conscience-free sexual rampage - cos that's what you guys do all the time, right?
Kirstie said:i really hope that one day i wake up and 'find that i'm male' ... so i could go on a conscience-free sexual rampage - cos that's what you guys do all the time, right?
Tim Bennet. said:I except the rationale that you can be 'unfaithful' if you establish a 'non contact' relationship in which your feelings and concerns for the other person are more sincere and meaningful than those you have for your established partner. This situation is certainly recognisable from classic literature as well as the number of people who quickly marry their 'best friend' after bereavement. The lack of any physical contact in no way annulled the reality of where their heart really lay.
But if a sincere relationship without physical contact is to be considered 'unfaithful', then it's clearly the displacement of the 'emotional connection' that is key to this definition. Therefore is the inverse okay? Should an opportunist, totally insincere, knee trembler with Tracy behind the bike shed really be considered unfaithful?