I think people miss the point here. If high visibility clothes reduces the chances of an accident even by as low as 1%, it's worth it.
Presumed Liability, the british 'government' refused to implement it saying it would lead to Cash For Crash claims by Cyclists.This ^^^ How do we get this into the British psyche / culture?!
Presumed Liability, the british 'government' refused to implement it saying it would lead to Cash For Crash claims by Cyclists.
The first part of that story is most confusing, I'm not sure who hit who, who was driving what, whether a pedestrian, cyclist or what was involved apart from an expensive car.It helped us at least once in Germany.
I think people miss the point here. If high visibility clothes reduces the chances of an accident even by as low as 1%, it's worth it.
I think you'll find it does make you easier to see.
Now the darker nights are creeping in, check your Hi-Vis under led lighting. Only the reflective strips will work if your choice is Saturn Yellow.I think people miss the point here. If high visibility clothes reduces the chances of an accident even by as low as 1%, it's worth it.
I don't drive, but I'll go with contrast over Hi-Vis any day.I think you'll find it does make you easier to see. You do realise it's compulsory to have at least a high visibility jacket in your car if you drive in Europe, don't you?
Unless, of course, you think it unnecessary after brexit as everyone in the UK 's eyesight will improve, they will become good drivers and mindful of other road users
No you are missing the point. I agree with you and I do wear high viz gear. In fact I have just made another light weigh harness for the winter commute. . The point is that helmets and viz vests are personal choice, not law. It is not for other people to try and and inflencd what you do or wear.I think people miss the point here. If high visibility clothes reduces the chances of an accident even by as low as 1%, it's worth it.