The problem with Communism comrade Bajic is precisely this - you limit everyone's ability to choose while claiming that your own multiple choices are not only superior but "correct". You list "motor cars" which have a totally inferior capacity for using gas (note: petrol is NOT correct) than my offer without considering the advantages to free market Capitalism that a 'gas guzzler' like this provides. Besides which, my choice comes with pre installed gun rack and NRA approval so how can it not be, with mathematical subtleties or gross math The One?
I only wanted you to be happy, but you seem determined to make things difficult for yourself.
I offered you the chance to have the same number of cars (one) on your list as I have on mine.
Just because I have spares and alternatives and stand-by options, it is still just one car. But the list has the appearence of containing several cars, as a sort of optical phenomenon caused by the presence of several car names.
Nonetheless, you are still determined to say this is unfair. You had your chance. I shall have you shot.
Back to the thread... the Chapron is a nice addition, as is the 1960s Mercedes estate. The '61 T-Bird is disqualified because it was in a pop ditty.
The quattro is sort of good, but sort of cheesy. Maybe the one that Mouton drove to second in the championship, which wasn't (I think) a Sport quattro. The really hardcore ones are a bit too silly. Nobody has yet mentioned the 205 T-16 or the Renault 5 Turbo, so points have been deducted from you all.
Although the HY Citroen is not strictly a car, it is allowable. However, the bicycle and the motor boat are not, because they are clearly a bicycle and a motor boat.
The 2CV Sahara is an inspired addition and I am allowing it also as an additional, spare, stand-by choice on my own list of one car - but I would want Dyane motors in it, with front and rear inboard discs and the gearboxes from 2CV4s, for those super-doop low ratios. It would eat Mini 1000 Automatics for breakfast.