OK, I reported a few posts on the Evening Standard and the Mail website versions of this story. I felt it completely unnacceptable that people were allowed to distract from the assault to launch a tirade about cyclists or create conjecture.
So today I have recieved this from the ES team:
It has come to our attention that you have been consistently spamming our comments with apparent reports of abuse.
Our abuse flagging function is there to allow users to inform us of inappropriate or abusive postings, and not to enable you to undermine those views and postings you happen to disagree with.
For further information can I please refer you to the terms and conditions of using our website.
We are pleased you choose to use or online comment service, but please do so responsibly.
Regards
Gareth Vipers
London Evening Standard
I have replied asking why allowing such comment is acceptable? I have also pointed out that they would not tolerate such comment on any other story of violence be that normal assault or sexual, and I have strongly asked them to either screen more closely or turn off the commenting ability on such stories.
I'd like to know why they consider comments about buzzing cyclists acceptable, tirades about non existant taxes that all bear a) no relevance and b) just incite the idiots out there...!