That 'lack of edge' actually tells us more about the state of British TV than anything else.
It is a laid back and often intelligent show. It's a duck out of water in dumb Britain and something I'd watch.
TV hysteria is for children.
I think the show is aimed at a more beginner level than some members of this forum. Imagine how off putting it would have been if he'd said "Well I need to check the chain, that's a tenner for a tool for that. Oh, it's worn I'll need a toolkit to get the chain off and the cassette off, let's call that an even ton". Joe Bloggs down the street would be packing the bike back in the garage before the show was over.
True but a beginner will recognise the Cervelo as "a bike" and be able to at least equate it with their own steed.Ok agreed but how many begginers ride around on Carbon Cervelo's?
I also dont really see why actually giving an idea of realistic cost is such a bad idea. And i say realistic because i cant see too many new riders going around on SPD SL`s that probably cost a ton on their own.
Maybe even a plug for their sponsors to show that decent replacement parts need not cost the earth.
very dull.Which is why they need kit reviews..deff not dull!
very dull.
I don't entirely agree with Carl, but I accept it's an uphill struggle. It's possible to speak and write beautifully about cycling (Henry Miller did it), and it should be very possible to make film about cycling that is beautiful. Having said that......I'm struggling to recall an example.
This is how you make cycling interesting:
In your opinion.I've said this on another forum. The fundamental problem with that programme is the subject matter. Cyclists talking about bikes and cycling, the cyclists themselves judging by the guests so far, are just not very interesting. The producers are trying to make a show on a very small budget about a subject that is dull. Riding a bike is fun, nearly every aspect of owning and riding a bike is fun, but listening to others talk about it is dull. That is the problem with the programme it's duller than a dull person staring at a dull puddle.