From a pedestrian point of view ... I find it rude to be bellowed at by someone on a bike. Also, if he/she is so near me that I can hear them without them shouting, that IMO is too near...
I'm not disagreeing with your overall post, but; my usual practice (depending on the width of the path) is to roll up behind someone and say "excuse me" - I think that shouting from further back is rude, and prefer to use my voice rather than a bell as I feel that is more courteous. Are you saying that you object to a spoken "excuse me" from a stationary or near-stationary cyclist?
I also run and I'm still perfecting the best distance to call "excuse me" from if I need to warn someone of my approach - too near and by the time the pedestrian has realised what's behind them you're on top of them. So is has to be further back and a bit louder (without sounding rude - and it is of course harder not to sound rude when you're running as you're out of breath! You shouldn't be cycling at a speed that will make you out of breath on a shared use path, IMO).
To be honest, I think we as cyclists can't win on shared use paths - no matter what we do, someone will object.
I would hear and adjust my position on the road to let you pass. If you are already on top of me whispering sweet "excuse me" I would probably turn the wrong way and bump into you, dislodging my headphones in the process
Now, if you had a BIG bell like mine, I could hear you even if my mp3 player is blaring "rocket man" at top volume ...
You only need to ride slowly when passing pedestrians. If you want to go fast past them, that's the only reason I can think of for using a long distance warning like a bellow.
This thread's nearly as good as a helmet debate.
