U
User6179
Guest
Do I still need a licence if I run a cable from my neighbours virgin box ( the receiver) to a monitor in my house ?
The reality is different though... many people have a TV for video game use or purely for watching DVDs or listening to digital radio (or so they claim), and haven't been prosecuted for not having a license.I suggest you read the primary legislation, which is quoted upthread. It is very clear: if you have a televisions receiver installed or (note it is 'or' - not 'and') use it for receiving broadcasts you need a licence. Nothing in the Regulations contradicts that.
Then your company may wish to seek legal advice.
The law is clear (even though the TV Licensing web-site gives a somewhat different interpretation of it): if you have equipment installed capable of receiving a live broadcast you are required to have a license. TV Licensing are not required to evidence that you are watching live broadcasts.
As I indicated upthread, TV Licensing take a particular view - but the law itself is very clear. If you want to make sure that you are compliant with the law, rather than at the mercy of the whims of Crapita (who we know play fast and loose with the law) then the legislation is the thing to look at.
When anyone comes through your gate to get to your door they are allowed to presume that if the gate isnt locked that you allow them to do so.
Write to them telling them you no longer allow their employees or agents to acces your property.
If your door opens onto the street this wont work.
Basically, unpacked and capable of being used.
Should I mention it now, do you think?No I don't think you have.
If memory serves, the Cranial Decorative Undergarment Regulations (Oppression of Scotland) 1707 require a licence for any pants capable of containing bollocks.I have a TV that has no BBC channels (unionist scum broadcaster, etc), do I need a pair of pants for my head?
Not even that pile of unionist bollocks masquerading as "inclusiveness"What?!?! Not even BBC Alba? Call yourself a Scot....