Dave 123
Legendary Member
- Location
- Cambridgeshire alps
Granny gear
Simultaneously perpetuates at least two different undesirable attitudes.
I look great in my house coat and curlers. Don't knock it.
Granny gear
Simultaneously perpetuates at least two different undesirable attitudes.
A sportive?
For me, I do 'winter miles' which are shorter rides and not particularly at pace. The idea being that the weather is so foul that doing huge 160km rides isn't particularly appealing, and that the lesser frequency of these rides means that my fitness isn't quite what it might be at a time in the year when I'm out regularly (like summer)
For example, average winter ride is 50-60km, usually at a pace of 23-25km/h. A normal summer ride is 80-140km at closer to 30km/h+
Does that make sense?
This thread is petty, nit-picking and not entirely to be taken seriously, but feel free to join in.
1. "Gents bike" - Only ever used to describe BSOs, and makes you think of toilets
2. "I'm going for a cycle" - No, you're going for a ride.
3. "I've ordered my new n+1" - No, you haven't. n+1 is a term used to describe the correct number of bikes to own. It isn't a single bicycle.
Maybe its easier when all the speed limits (!) and signposts are still imperial, though I'm bilingual anyway. 'Winter kilometres, summer smiles' doesn't work eitherI HATE miles, they don't fit in with the modern metric way, scientists and engineers work with metric units, mathematical formulae used in schools and computers all normalise on metric, why would anyone want to arbitrarily use units that have no relationship with any other unit?
Speed limits rarely have any concern for me on the bike, the electronic ones that display speed is more of a challenge. Only exception is perhaps the arbitrary ones on non-public roads (say hospital grounds, parks) and anyone doing more than a pootle in those areas is a cock anyway.Maybe its easier when all the speed limits (!) and signposts are still imperial, though I'm bilingual anyway. 'Winter kilometres, summer smiles' doesn't work either![]()
Er, yes, there is something to train for. I did a 100 mile sportive the year before last, having done about 10 miles max up to the point of signing up for it. So yes. I had to train for it to be able to do that distance.Last time I looked, a sportive isn't a race. If you want to compete, go for it but if you're a regular, non-competitive cyclist surely there's no need to train for anything is there?
Tony.
I HATE miles, they don't fit in with the modern metric way, scientists and engineers work with metric units, mathematical formulae used in schools and computers all normalise on metric, why would anyone want to arbitrarily use units that have no relationship with any other unit?
Hence the '(!)' in my post - maybe too subtle?Speed limits rarely have any concern for me on the bike, the electronic ones that display speed is more of a challenge. Only exception is perhaps the arbitrary ones on non-public roads (say hospital grounds, parks) and anyone doing more than a pootle in those areas is a cock anyway.
- but what do you call to inform the group?
Was for me anywayHence the '(!)' in my post - maybe too subtle?
This post isIf spectator on a charity ride say's to me "dig deep" one more time I'm gonna shove a seatpost up his/her jacksy.
Yes - seems someone gets it wrong sometime on every ride, (even meCar up
Car down
Still gets on my nerves.
I've got it wrong too and I was just thinking the same. Not sure about the other direction, though.Yes - seems someone gets it wrong sometime on every ride, (even meoccasionally) often think 'car back' would be better?