Rhythm Thief
Veteran
We have a classic junction with a pinch point so it's important to be as far over to the right as is possible, it's not a very hard concept to understand. There are junctions up and down the land like this. People get it slightly wrong all the time and a lot of the time it amounts to nothing. Other times there are a lot of near misses (see it often enough). The pick up truck should have been slightly further forward and definitely slightly further to the right. It's difficult to get right, we don't know why he was positioned like that. He did have his indicator on, unlike the bus, which is why I gave him 10% blame. He obviously wasn't overtaking anything or undertaking anything. It seems a fair assessment of the portion. 10% is not very responsible.
Well, it's more responsibility than I'd have allocated to him, given that he's innocently sitting there waiting to turn right when some twonk rides into his rear nearside. He's not positioned badly at all, he's just in the right turn lane.
The bus was both undertaking the taxi and cyclist who collided and trying to overtake other cyclists.
Now this I am baffled by. I suspect we might be watching different videos, to be honest. The only taxi I can see in that clip is immediately behind the bus; the only cyclist I can see near the bus is the one who tries his hardest to crawl under the rear wheel of it. Where is the taxi the bus is undertaking? and where are the cyclists that the bus is overtaking? You certainly can't see them on the video.
I know why the bus driver did what he did, and he knew a cycle lane started on the other side of the junction and 2 standard lanes become one so he'd have to move further over to the right. It still counts as an overtaking manoeuvre and a change of course though and he is partially to blame. That he waited a few seconds and did it at low speed (sensible as a lot to take in at the junction) I have assigned 25% to the driver
I know why the bus driver did what he did, too. It's because the lights changed, he did a quick mirror check and off he went. Straight on, so no indication necessary. He doesn't move over, he doesn't pull out to overtake anything and he doesn't undertake anyone. All that happens to make this different from thousands of similar manoevres carried out every day is the cyclist appears at warp factor 5 going for a gap which isn't there.
You haven't explained why you think the bus did nothing wrong, you just said so by reference to the cyclist. Well yes that's fine, but I'm not very interested in trivial solutions, even more so when they are actively so disagreeing with someone else.
I don't really understand this. The whole incident is caused by the cyclist (at least, without him there is no incident, just a bus pulling away from some traffic lights); with reference to what else would I be discussing it? What "trivial solutions" are you on about? Solutions to what?
... it's you being rumbled for your bad behaviour on a number of occasions.
Only by you, though. No one else has ever said anything.
P.S. thank you for the strawman and colourful language.
Colourful language, yes (though I think you'll agree "cocksponge" is a masterly insult) but I'm struggling to see where I've made a strawman.