D
Deleted member 1258
Guest
I agree Dave, would you think less than £10 a year on cycling shoes expensive though.
No
I agree Dave, would you think less than £10 a year on cycling shoes expensive though.
There you go, I have only bought 3 pairs of cycling shoes in the last 30 years.
About the same as me
Agree. Even though I and the GLW are both working, £100 is still a fair wedge. It's very much what your particular view on value is. Never pay full price for something if it or an equivalent is available at a lower cost. For example, why pay £1.29 / litre for petrol when it's available for £1.16 / litre two miles along the road, but folk do.And me, a hundred quid is a substantial sum,
Precisely. Ref my post about cycling glasses; 'Ow much - ?'It only gets expensive if you want to save a few grams or you must have the latest bling.
Precisely. Ref my post about cycling glasses; 'Ow much - ?''Ahh, but they;'re Oakleys - !'
Nuff said - !![]()
There's nothing wrong with bling, only if you feel you must spend more than you can afford when there are cheaper alternatives that will do the same job.Where does bling begin, got more than two rooms in your house, bling, got a computer, bling, more than one bike, bling.