jonesy
Guru
The other day I was idly browsing in a bookshop and noticed that someone, his son I think, has recently written a sequel to Frank Herbert's Dune series. Although I quite enjoyed those books as a teenager, I don't think I'll bother with this one and suspect that Herbert might have been better off calling it a day after the very first Dune, a sci-fi classic.
Some others that spring to mind: some of Asimov's later, sadly rather contrived, efforts at linking his Robot and Foundation stories; Ursula Le Guin's disappointing sequel to her brilliant Earthsea trilogy; and, IMHO, a real stinker that devalued the original story: Richard Adams' Maia, a prequel, written some years later, to his excellent Shardik.
So what do you think are the sequels (or prequels) that shouldn't have been written?
Some others that spring to mind: some of Asimov's later, sadly rather contrived, efforts at linking his Robot and Foundation stories; Ursula Le Guin's disappointing sequel to her brilliant Earthsea trilogy; and, IMHO, a real stinker that devalued the original story: Richard Adams' Maia, a prequel, written some years later, to his excellent Shardik.
So what do you think are the sequels (or prequels) that shouldn't have been written?