No, it depends how low a gear you have.Challenging, but not impossible imho. Depends how much pain you can put up with![]()
I know this will sound pretty stupid, but I always thought mountain bike was just a name..... the earlier post suggests that mountain bikes are better up hills than road bikes....so they are actually called mountain bikes because they are the best for hills then, right? (apologies for my ignorance lol!)
The most important factor by far for suitability for climbing hills is how low the gear ratio is. The weight is also a factor, but a much more minor one.
If the lowest gear is the same, there's not much in it as to whether a mountain bike (fatter tyres, front and possibly rear suspension, straight bars, stronger frame) or a "road bike" ( thinner tyres, lighter frame, drop bars) would be better - probably the road bike would actually be better because it's lighter and the tyres produce less resistance.
BUT: the lowest gear is unlikely to be the same. Mountain bikes are designed for going up, err, mountains, so have low gears. Road bikes are designed for people who fancy themselves as mega fit and eschew low gears, so tend not to have sensibly low gears. Any off the peg road bike will almost certainly not have terribly low gears, which is why a mountain bike would be better for comfortable cycling up hills on roads than a road bike.
You can, of course, have a "road bike" - lightweight frame, low resistance tyres, no suspension, drop bars - with sensibly low gears. It's called a touring bike.
[apologies for edit - I hit "post" by mistake too soon]
[edited again to say, Pale Rider beat me to it, rather more succinctly]
I wonder if that is because even his gearing wasn't low enough? You really do need mega low gears to climb steep hills at average fitness levels whilst maintaining a reasonably high cadence, lower gears even than most touring bikes have. I would agree that when it becomes a struggle to keep the pedals turning each revolution, walking may be easier. But I stick with my view that, if you are twiddling and if you can keep the front wheel on the ground, pedalling will always be more efficient than pushing.I spoke to a touring cyclist about climbing as we both ground up one of the climbs in the Lake District.
He often parks his bike half way up a fell - or whatever you call it - to walk up to the top.
As a strong walker, he said it was often just as quick for him to push the bike up a steep road climb, even though he could manage to pedal it.
I wonder if that is because even his gearing wasn't low enough? You really do need mega low gears to climb steep hills at average fitness levels whilst maintaining a reasonably high cadence, lower gears even than most touring bikes have. I would agree that when it becomes a struggle to keep the pedals turning each revolution, walking may be easier. But I stick with my view that, if you are twiddling and if you can keep the front wheel on the ground, pedalling will always be more efficient than pushing.
I also know somebody who tried to tow a twin axle caravan up it with a 1.3 Focus, shouldn't have even been towing it in the first place, it was well over the Focus max weight. He brought the whole road to a complete stop, eventually they managed to squeeze a HGV passed him, tied a rope on & the HGV pulled him up to the top.A few years ago, I towed a twin-axle caravan up it
Mindst you, that was with a Land Rover 90 (V8)