Whenever I do a ride I get a couple of entries in Strava, Bkool posts one and the watch another, now I'm getting a third from the bike
But it did highlight some weird differences I thought I'd share. The bike had peak power nearly 100w higher than Bkool but also some very low points in the power curve 30w or so (freewheeling I guess) but Bkool didn't have these at all so I guess I have to take back my original comment about power being the same (maybe it is when it's consistent) but it's clear the 'outliers' are being smoothed out and therefore they are meddling. I guess when catering for so many pieces of hardware they have to apply bias here and there to try and level the field. I thought I'd dig into it and extracted the TCX file from Bkool and the .FIT file from Wattbike but it created more mysteries than it solved. Average watts was within 1w, average cadence within 1rpm but here's the kicker I managed to line up the two timelines in a spreadsheet and they do track each other but oddly the ride in Bkool has a timeline 30secs longer, all the numbers just gradually drift away from the .FIT timeline at which point I realised life must have more to offer and decided throw the towel in.