I notice no one has gone for the aesthetics thang. The "I look like a god" bit was a bit of a gag. You can choose that one without necessarily being impossibly big-headed - it could be about the beauty of a bicycle in motion.
I was severely tempted - as I said on post number 47.
The beauty of the bike as an object is numerous and overlooked. Apart from the joy of a massively expensive bike porn aficianado, the siplicity and efficiency of design is unique.
I mentioned the silence of the speeding bike apart from the occasional slick gear change - but it is also hugely efficient.
Many of the people I work with are old and infirm and can walk only a few hundred yards, but they can often cycle long distances due to the bike's incredible efficiency (these aren't youngsters on top of the range Colnagos, but on 40 year old sit-up-and begs with about 0 gears.
Aesthetically, one of my abiding memories was of marshalling the Martlett's ride at the bottom of Ditcling a couple of years ago.
The early arrivers were about 4am - it was completely quiet, I was alone, it was dark and I could see from a longish way the eerie glow of Halogen lights flickering silently above me like will-o-the-wisps.
It made the whole morning a pleasure - it's something I'll never see again and was superb.
I feel a bit guilty I didn't put aesthetics down now on your poll - but personally bikes are about the freedom to get about on a practical level, so I put that down.